Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;15(7):E335-E339.
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6868.

Upgrading on radical prostatectomy specimens of very low- and low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: A population-level analysis

Affiliations

Upgrading on radical prostatectomy specimens of very low- and low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: A population-level analysis

Rashid K Sayyid et al. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: A proportion of prostate cancer (PCa) patients initially managed with active surveillance (AS) are upgraded to a higher Gleason score (GS) at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP). Our objective was to determine predictors of upgrading on RP specimens using a national database.

Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate with Watchful Waiting database was used to identify AS patients diagnosed with very low- or low-risk PCa who underwent delayed RP between 2010 and 2015. The primary outcome was upgrading to GS 7 disease or worse. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate demographic and oncological predictors of upgrading on final specimen.

Results: A total of 3775 men underwent RP after a period of AS, 3541 (93.8%) of whom were cT2a; 792 (21.0%) patients were upgraded on RP specimen, with 85.4%, 10.6%, and 3.4% upgraded to GS 7(3+4), 7(4+3), and 8 diseases, respectively. On multivariable analysis, higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis (5-10 vs. 0-2 ng/ml, odd ratio [OR] 2.59, p<0.001) and percent core involvement (80-100% vs. 0-20%, OR 2.52, p=0.003) were significant predictors of upgrading on final RP specimen, whereas higher socioeconomic status predicted lower odds of upgrading (highest vs. lowest quartile OR 0.75, p=0.013).

Conclusions: Higher baseline PSA and percent positive cores involvement are associated with significantly increased risk of upgrading on RP after AS, whereas higher socioeconomic status predicts lower odds of such events. These results may help identify patients at increased risk of adverse pathology on final specimen who may benefit from earlier definitive treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors report no competing personal or financial interests related to this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart. GS: Gleason score; PSA: prostate-specific antigen; SEER: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; WW: watchful waiting.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sanda MG, Cadeddu JA, Kirkby E, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline. Part I: Risk stratification, shared decision-making, and care options. J Urol. 2018;199:683–90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.095. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klotz L, Vesprini D, Sethukavalan P, et al. Long-term followup of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:272–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1192. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verep S, Erdem S, Ozluk Y, et al. The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients who are eligible for active surveillance: How safe is it to depend on bioptic pathology? Prostate. 2019;79:1523–9. doi: 10.1002/pros.23873. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaye DR, Qi J, Morgan TM, et al. Pathological upgrading at radical prostatectomy for patients with grade group 1 prostate cancer: Implications of confirmatory testing for patients considering active surveillance. BJU Int. 2019;123:846–53. doi: 10.1111/bju.14554. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vellekoop A, Loeb S, Folkvaljon Y, et al. Population-based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer. J Urol. 2014;191:350–7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.09.034. - DOI - PubMed