Performance of an Antigen-Based Test for Asymptomatic and Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Testing at Two University Campuses - Wisconsin, September-October 2020
- PMID: 33382679
- PMCID: PMC9191905
- DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm695152a3
Performance of an Antigen-Based Test for Asymptomatic and Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Testing at Two University Campuses - Wisconsin, September-October 2020
Abstract
Antigen-based tests for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), are inexpensive and can return results within 15 minutes (1). Antigen tests have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for use in asymptomatic and symptomatic persons within the first 5-12 days after symptom onset (2). These tests have been used at U.S. colleges and universities and other congregate settings (e.g., nursing homes and correctional and detention facilities), where serial testing of asymptomatic persons might facilitate early case identification (3-5). However, test performance data from symptomatic and asymptomatic persons are limited. This investigation evaluated performance of the Sofia SARS Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA) (Quidel Corporation) compared with real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 detection among asymptomatic and symptomatic persons at two universities in Wisconsin. During September 28-October 9, a total of 1,098 paired nasal swabs were tested using the Sofia SARS Antigen FIA and real-time RT-PCR. Virus culture was attempted on all antigen-positive or real-time RT-PCR-positive specimens. Among 871 (79%) paired swabs from asymptomatic participants, the antigen test sensitivity was 41.2%, specificity was 98.4%, and in this population the estimated positive predictive value (PPV) was 33.3%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.8%. Antigen test performance was improved among 227 (21%) paired swabs from participants who reported one or more symptoms at specimen collection (sensitivity = 80.0%; specificity = 98.9%; PPV = 94.1%; NPV = 95.9%). Virus was isolated from 34 (46.6%) of 73 antigen-positive or real-time RT-PCR-positive nasal swab specimens, including two of 18 that were antigen-negative and real-time RT-PCR-positive (false-negatives). The advantages of antigen tests such as low cost and rapid turnaround might allow for rapid identification of infectious persons. However, these advantages need to be balanced against lower sensitivity and lower PPV, especially among asymptomatic persons. Confirmatory testing with an FDA-authorized nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), such as RT-PCR, should be considered after negative antigen test results in symptomatic persons, and after positive antigen test results in asymptomatic persons (1).
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Diagnostic Performance of an Antigen Test with RT-PCR for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a Hospital Setting - Los Angeles County, California, June-August 2020.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 May 14;70(19):702-706. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7019a3. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021. PMID: 33983916 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test for SARS-CoV-2 Infection at Two Community-Based Testing Sites - Pima County, Arizona, November 3-17, 2020.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 22;70(3):100-105. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7003e3. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021. PMID: 33476316 Free PMC article.
-
Epidemiologic Characteristics Associated With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Antigen-Based Test Results, Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) Cycle Threshold Values, Subgenomic RNA, and Viral Culture Results From University Testing.Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 15;73(6):e1348-e1355. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab303. Clin Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33846714 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3(3):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7:CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3. PMID: 33760236 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Antigen Testing (January 2023).Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 27;78(7):e350-e384. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad032. Clin Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 36702617 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Community Mitigation of COVID-19 and Portrayal of Testing on TikTok: Descriptive Study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jun 10;7(6):e29528. doi: 10.2196/29528. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021. PMID: 34081591 Free PMC article.
-
SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests for screening of healthcare workers; experience with over 48,000 combined antigen tests and RT-PCR tests.J Clin Virol. 2023 Jan;158:105326. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105326. Epub 2022 Nov 12. J Clin Virol. 2023. PMID: 36403314 Free PMC article.
-
Caregiver perceptions of in-home COVID-19 testing for children with medical complexity: a qualitative study.BMC Pediatr. 2022 Sep 8;22(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03550-5. BMC Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 36076181 Free PMC article.
-
The causal relationship model of factors influencing COVID-19 preventive behaviors during the post-pandemic era and implications for health prevention strategies: a case of Bangkok City, Thailand.BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09818-8. BMC Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 39210295 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of the Sofia SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test as frontline test in a university hospital, Germany.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 May;103(1):115663. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115663. Epub 2022 Feb 26. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 35331603 Free PMC article.
References
-
- CDC. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): interim guidance for antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/resources/antigen-tests-gu...
-
- Food and Drug Administration. In vitro diagnostics EUAs. Silver Spring, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration; 2020. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-em...
-
- CDC. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): guidance for testing, screening, and outbreak response for institutions of higher education (IHEs). Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/colleges-universitie...
-
- CDC. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): testing guidelines for nursing homes. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/nursing-homes-testing.html
-
- CDC. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): interim considerations for SARS-CoV-2 testing in correctional and detention facilities. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/correction-detention...
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous