Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244293.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244293. eCollection 2020.

Prognostic roles of diabetes mellitus and hypertension in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib

Affiliations

Prognostic roles of diabetes mellitus and hypertension in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib

Ming-Han Hsieh et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background & aims: It remains limited whether diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN) affect the prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib. Our study attempted to elucidate the roles of DM/HTN and the effects of diabetes medications among advanced HCC patients receiving sorafenib.

Methods: From August 2012 to February 2018, 733 advanced HCC patients receiving sorafenib were enrolled at China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan. According to the presence/absence of DM or HTN, they were divided into four groups: control [DM(-)/HTN(-), n = 353], DM-only [DM(+)/HTN(-), n = 91], HTN-only [DM(-)/HTN(+), n = 184] and DM+HTN groups [DM(+)/HTN(+), n = 105]. Based on the types of diabetes medications, there were three groups among DM patients (the combined cohort of DM-only and DM+HTN groups), including metformin (n = 63), non-metformin oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA) (n = 104) and regular insulin (RI)/neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) groups (n = 29). We then assessed the survival differences between these groups.

Results: DM-only and DM+HTN groups significantly presented longer overall survival (OS) than control group (control vs. DM-only, 7.70 vs. 11.83 months, p = 0.003; control vs. DM+HTN, 7.70 vs. 11.43 months, p = 0.008). However, there was no significant OS difference between control and HTN-only group (7.70 vs. 8.80 months, p = 0.111). Besides, all groups of DM patients showed significantly longer OS than control group (control vs. metformin, 7.70 vs. 12.60 months, p = 0.011; control vs. non-metformin OHA, 7.70 vs. 10.80 months, p = 0.016; control vs. RI/NPH, 7.70 vs. 15.20 months, p = 0.026).

Conclusions: Rather than HTN, DM predicts better prognosis in advanced HCC treated with sorafenib. Besides, metformin, non-metformin OHA and RI/NPH are associated with longer survival among DM-related advanced HCC patients receiving sorafenib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves of control, DM-only, HTN-only and DM+HTN groups.
(A) The median OS was 7.70±0.58, 11.83±1.38, 8.80±0.85 and 11.43±2.24 months in control, DM-only, HTN-only and DM+HTN groups respectively. In comparison with control group, both DM-only and DM+HTN groups had better OS (p = 0.003 and p = 0.008 respectively) while HTN-only group showed an insignificant OS difference (p = 0.111). (B) The median PFS was 3.70±0.37, 6.83±1.70, 4.43±0.80 and 6.33±1.78 months in control, DM-only, HTN-only and DM+HTN groups respectively. In comparison with control group, both DM-only and DM+HTN groups had better PFS (p = 0.008 and p = 0.004 respectively) while HTN-only group showed an insignificant PFS difference (p = 0.094). *Log-rank test: A p-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves of control, metformin, non-metformin OHA and RI/NPH groups.
(A) The median OS was 7.70±0.58, 12.60±2.17, 10.80±1.20 and 15.20±4.45 months in control, metformin, non-metformin OHA and RI/NPH groups respectively. In comparison with control group, metformin, non-metformin OHA and RI/NPH groups significantly presented better OS (p = 0.011, p = 0.016 and p = 0.026 respectively). (B) The median PFS was 3.70±0.37, 8.17±1.53, 5.67±1.57 and 7.17±2.04 months in control, metformin, non-metformin OHA and RI/NPH groups respectively. Compared with control group, metformin, non-metformin OHA and RI/NPH groups significantly presented better PFS (p = 0.009, p = 0.017 and p = 0.039 respectively). *Log-rank test: A p-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Anti-tumor mechanisms of sorafenib, metformin and protamine: A review of previous studies [, , , –, –66].
Abbreviation: VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR, VEGF receptor; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; PDGFR, PDGF receptor; PKC, protein kinase C; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; IGF-1R, IGF-1 receptor; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; LKB1, liver kinase B1; AMPK, adenosine 5’-monophosphate-activated protein kinase; TSC1/2, tuberous sclerosis proteins 1 and 2 complex; mTOR, mammalian Target of Rapamycin.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. 10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGlynn KA, Petrick JL, London WT. Global epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: An emphasis on demographic and regional variability. Clin Liver Dis. 2015;19(2):223–238. 10.1016/j.cld.2015.01.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Likhitsup A, Razumilava N, Parikh ND. Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Standard and the Future. Clin Liver Dis. 2019;13(1):13–19. 10.1002/cld.782 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galle PR, Forner A, Llovet JM, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, Raoul J-L, et al. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69(1):182–236. 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang J-H, Changchien C-S, Hu T-H, Lee C-M, Kee K-M, Lin C-Y, et al. The efficacy of treatment schedules according to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging for hepatocellular carcinoma—Survival analysis of 3892 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(7):1000–1006. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.02.018 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms