Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1988 Feb;33(2):161-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF01535727.

Does healing of esophagitis improve esophageal motor function?

Affiliations

Does healing of esophagitis improve esophageal motor function?

V F Eckardt. Dig Dis Sci. 1988 Feb.

Abstract

This study investigates whether healing of erosive esophagitis leads to an improvement of esophageal motor abnormalities. Manometric studies were performed in 18 patients with erosive esophagitis before and after healing of the mucosal lesions and in 15 healthy controls. Nine patients were treated with a Nissen fundoplication and nine with H2-receptor antagonists. After healing, patients were followed for a mean duration of 3.0 +/- 0.4 years. Compared to controls, patients had significantly lower contraction amplitudes and lower esophageal sphincter pressures (P less than 0.01), while the duration and velocity of esophageal contractions was similar in both groups. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure increased after surgical treatment, while no such changes were observed in medically treated patients. In both groups amplitude, duration, and velocity of esophageal contractions were not affected by healing of esophagitis. On extended follow-up, all surgically treated patients remained asymptomatic while eight of nine medically treated patients developed a symptomatic relapse which was accompanied by erosive esophagitis in six of them. The lack of improvement in esophageal motor function after healing of esophagitis may contribute to the frequent occurrence of relapse in medically treated patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1983 Jun 17;108(24):930-5 - PubMed
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1979 Nov;24(11):858-61 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 1981 Feb;80(2):285-91 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 1980 Jul;88(1):101-7 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1985 Jun;201(6):728-35 - PubMed