Obstetric Violence in Spain (Part II): Interventionism and Medicalization during Birth
- PMID: 33383862
- PMCID: PMC7794951
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010199
Obstetric Violence in Spain (Part II): Interventionism and Medicalization during Birth
Abstract
Background: obstetric violence can partially be represented by the high number of interventions and medicalization rates during the birthing process. The objective of the present study was to determine the interventionism and medicalization levels during childbirth in Spain.
Methods: a descriptive, retrospective, and cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2018 and June 2019.
Results: the intervention percentages were 34.2% for Kristeller maneuver and 39.3% for episiotomy. Differences appeared in public, private, and mixed healthcare settings (p < 0.001). The mean satisfaction, with healthcare in the different settings, was estimated at 6.88 points (SD ± 2.146) in public healthcare, 4.76 points (SD ± 3.968) in private healthcare, and 8.03 points (SD ± 1.930) in mixed healthcare (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in Spanish autonomous communities.
Conclusions: births in Spain seem to be highly intervened. In this study, a certain equity criterion was found concerning interventionism during childbirth in Spain. Healthcare influenced female intervention, satisfaction, and perception levels for obstetric violence; this evidences that female empowerment plays an important role.
Keywords: Spain; interventionism; medicalization; midwife; obstetric violence; sexual and reproduction health.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Obstetric Violence in Spain (Part I): Women's Perception and Interterritorial Differences.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;17(21):7726. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217726. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33105788 Free PMC article.
-
Obstetric Violence in Spain (Part III): Healthcare Professionals, Times, and Areas.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 24;18(7):3359. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073359. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33805074 Free PMC article.
-
Components of obstetric violence in health facilities in Quito, Ecuador: A descriptive study on information, accompaniment, and position during childbirth.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Mar;148(3):355-360. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13075. Epub 2019 Dec 17. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020. PMID: 31785159
-
Obstetric Violence in Italy: From Theoretical Premises to Court Judgments.Clin Ter. 2024 Jan-Feb;175(1):57-67. doi: 10.7417/CT.2024.5034. Clin Ter. 2024. PMID: 38358478 Review.
-
The medicalization of birth and midwifery as resistance.Health Care Women Int. 2013;34(6):522-36. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2012.736569. Epub 2013 Mar 20. Health Care Women Int. 2013. PMID: 23514572 Review.
Cited by
-
Global prevalence and risk factors of obstetric violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jun;169(3):1012-1024. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16145. Epub 2025 Jan 13. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39803846 Free PMC article.
-
Breastfeeding and Obstetric Violence during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Spain: Maternal Perceptions.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 26;19(23):15737. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315737. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36497811 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of the Brazilian obstetrics physicians about the term obstetric violence: a cross-sectional study.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Mar 3;69(2):252-256. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220945. eCollection 2023. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023. PMID: 36888765 Free PMC article.
-
Obstetric Violence as an Infringement on Basic Bioethical Principles. Reflections Inspired by Focus Groups with Midwives.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 29;18(23):12553. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312553. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34886279 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers to informed consent in obstetric care during childbirth from practitioner's perspective: a qualitative study.BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 19;15(6):e101591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101591. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40537228 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bohren M.A., Vogel J.P., Hunter E.C., Lutsiv O., Makh S.K., Souza J.P., Aguiar C., Saraiva Coneglian F., Diniz A.L.A., Tunçalp Ö., et al. The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization Appropriate Technology for Birth. Lancet. 1985;24:436–437. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical