Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 12;118(2):e2022515118.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2022515118.

A chemiresistive methane sensor

Affiliations

A chemiresistive methane sensor

Máté J Bezdek et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

A chemiresistive sensor is described for the detection of methane (CH4), a potent greenhouse gas that also poses an explosion hazard in air. The chemiresistor allows for the low-power, low-cost, and distributed sensing of CH4 at room temperature in air with environmental implications for gas leak detection in homes, production facilities, and pipelines. Specifically, the chemiresistors are based on single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) noncovalently functionalized with poly(4-vinylpyridine) (P4VP) that enables the incorporation of a platinum-polyoxometalate (Pt-POM) CH4 oxidation precatalyst into the sensor by P4VP coordination. The resulting SWCNT-P4VP-Pt-POM composite showed ppm-level sensitivity to CH4 and good stability to air as well as time, wherein the generation of a high-valent platinum intermediate during CH4 oxidation is proposed as the origin of the observed chemiresistive response. The chemiresistor was found to exhibit selectivity for CH4 over heavier hydrocarbons such as n-hexane, benzene, toluene, and o-xylene, as well as gases, including carbon dioxide and hydrogen. The utility of the sensor in detecting CH4 using a simple handheld multimeter was also demonstrated.

Keywords: catalysis; chemiresistors; methane; selectors; sensor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interest statement: A patent has been filed on this technology.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Aerobic methane oxidation with a platinum-polyoxometalate precatalyst under mild conditions and the strategy reported in the present study. SWCNT, single-walled carbon nanotube; POM, polyoxometalate [H5PV2Mo10O40].
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Device fabrication schematic and chemiresistor composition. (A) Sensor fabrication and stepwise selector incorporation by spray coating of SWCNT-P4VP network (step 1), Pt coordination by soaking in [1-DMSO][SO3OCH3] solution (step 2), and anion exchange by soaking in [H5PV2Mo10O40] solution (step 3). (B) Proposed surface speciation of SWCNT-P4VP-Pt. (C) Proposed surface speciation of SWCNT-P4VP-Pt-POM.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Chemiresistor performance in methane sensing and control experiments. (A) Control CH4 sensing experiments omitting selector components contrasted with the sensing response of SWCNT-P4VP-Pt-POM. (Inset) Averaged change in conductance (represented as ΔG/G0, %) of SWCNT-P4VP-Pt-POM in response to 0.5% of CH4 in air (RH = 10 ± 5%). (B) Averaged conductance trace of SWCNT-P4VP-Pt-POM in response to three repeated 120-s exposures of 0.5% of CH4 each in air. (C) Chemiresistive responses of SWCNT-P4VP-Pt-POM to 120-s exposures to various CH4 concentrations in air (maroon), dry air (gray), or N2 (blue) carrier gas. (D) Chemiresistive responses of SWCNT-P4VP-Pt-POM to 120-s exposures to various CH4 concentrations in air. Shaded areas and error bars represent SDs (n = 4); all data were collected at room temperature.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Synthesis of [1-Py][SO3OCH3] and subsequent reaction with [H5PV2Mo10O40].
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Chemiresistor selectivity and stability studies. (A) Average device response (defined as change in conductance, ΔG/G0, %) of SWCNT-P4VP-Pt-POM toward 400 ppm of various interferants in air. (B) Normalized average response of freshly prepared and aged SWCNT-P4VP-Pt-POM devices toward 0.5% of CH4 in air. Error bars represent SDs (n = 4); all data were collected at room temperature.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Myhre G., et al. , "Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing” in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Stocker T. F. et al., Eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2013), pp. 659–740.
    1. Zabetakis M. G., Flammability characteristics of combustible gases and vapors. U.S. Bureau of Mines Bulletin 627, 1–121 (1965).
    1. Dlugokencky E. J., Steele L. P., Lang P. M., Masarie K. A., The growth rate and distribution of atmospheric methane. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 17021–17043 (1994).
    1. Shemshad J., Aminossadati S. M., Kizil M. S., A review of developments in near infrared methane detection based on tunable diode laser. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 171-172, 77–92 (2012).
    1. Caulton D. R., et al. , Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 6237–6242 (2014). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources