Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;53(5):869-873.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02726-1. Epub 2021 Jan 1.

Diagnosis and management of small intestinal injury due to percutaneous renal access

Affiliations
Review

Diagnosis and management of small intestinal injury due to percutaneous renal access

Victor Silvestre Soares Fanni et al. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Define factors for proper diagnosis and treatment of small intestinal injury during procedures with percutaneous renal access, thus optimizing favorable outcomes and avoiding complications and death during conservative or surgical approaches.

Materials and methods: Bibliographic review of case reports available in the literature and presentation of data from an additional case have been carried out.

Results: Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy was the procedure that most frequently caused injury of the small intestine. Time for diagnosis of the lesion took up to 5 days after the intraoperative phase. When occurring in the intraoperative phase, perforation was identified by direct endoscopic visualization; a catheter was then placed inside the intestinal lumen and a conservative approach to the derived fistula was adopted, which led to successful outcomes in all cases. Abdominal pain was the most common symptom in cases diagnosed during the postoperative phase (75%). In the presence of signs of peritonitis, surgical intervention was performed, with favorable evolution in all cases.

Conclusions: Conservative management of small intestine injuries is possible when there is no peritoneal contamination. Its success factors include intraoperative diagnosis and non-transfixing lesions, which is more common in duodenal involvement. Laparotomy to clean the cavity associated with a corrective approach (enterorrhaphy or enterectomy with primary anastomosis) was successfully indicated in cases of late diagnosis with signs of peritonitis, a situation that is most commonly found in transfixing lesions of ileum and jejunum.

Keywords: Intestinal complications; Jejunal perforation; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Percutaneous renal surgery; Small bowel perforation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Netto NR Jr, Lemos GC, Palma PC (1988) Staghorn calculi: percutaneous versus anatrophic nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 15(1–2):9–12
    1. Fernstrom I, Johansson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10:257–259 - DOI
    1. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51:899–906 - DOI
    1. Kontothanassis D, Bissas A (1997) Biliary peritonitis complicating percutaneous nephrostomy. Int Urol Nephrol 29:529–531 - DOI
    1. Sacha K, Szewczyk W, Bar K (1996) Massive haemorrhage presenting as a complication after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Int Urol Nephrol 28:315–318 - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources