Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;43(4):537-544.
doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02631-3. Epub 2021 Jan 1.

3D-printed anatomical models of the cystic duct and its variants, a low-cost solution for an in-house built simulator for laparoscopic surgery training

Affiliations

3D-printed anatomical models of the cystic duct and its variants, a low-cost solution for an in-house built simulator for laparoscopic surgery training

C Casas-Murillo et al. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: To explore a method to create affordable anatomical models of the biliary tree that are adequate for training laparoscopic cholecystectomy with an in-house built simulator.

Methods: We used a fused deposition modeling 3D printer to create molds of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) from Digital Imaging and Communication on Medicine (DICOM) images, and the molds were filled with silicone rubber. Thirteen surgeons with 4-5-year experience in the procedure evaluated the molds using a low-cost in-house built simulator utilizing a 5-point Likert-type scale.

Results: Molds produced through this method had a consistent anatomical appearance and overall realism that evaluators agreed or definitely agreed (4.5/5). Evaluators agreed on recommending the mold for resident surgical training.

Conclusions: 3D-printed molds created through this method can be applied to create affordable high-quality educational anatomical models of the biliary tree for training laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Keywords: 3D printing; 3D-printed molds; Anatomy education; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Low-cost simulator; Surgical planning; Surgical training.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agresta F, Campanile FC, Vettoretto N, Silecchia G, Bergamini C, Maida P, Esposito MG (2015) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 400(4):429–453 - DOI
    1. Badash I, Burtt K, Solorzano CA, Carey JN (2016) Innovations in surgery simulation: a review of past, current and future techniques. Ann Transl Med 4(23):453 - DOI
    1. Bücking TM, Hill ER, Robertson JL, Maneas E, Plumb AA, Nikitichev DI (2017) From medical imaging data to 3D printed anatomical models. PLoS ONE 12(5):e0178540 - DOI
    1. Cheung CL, Looi T, Lendvay TS, Drake JM, Farhat WA (2014) Use of 3-dimensional printing technology and silicone modeling in surgical simulation: development and face validation in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Surg Educ 71(5):762–767 - DOI
    1. Daemen JH, Heuts S, Olsthoorn JR, Maessen JG, Sardari Nia P (2019) Mitral valve modelling and three-dimensional printing for planning and simulation of mitral valve repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 55(3):543–551 - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources