Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 2;23(1):2.
doi: 10.1007/s11920-020-01213-9.

Reward Learning Through the Lens of RDoC: a Review of Theory, Assessment, and Empirical Findings in the Eating Disorders

Affiliations
Review

Reward Learning Through the Lens of RDoC: a Review of Theory, Assessment, and Empirical Findings in the Eating Disorders

Lauren M Schaefer et al. Curr Psychiatry Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Reward-related processes may represent important transdiagnostic factors underlying eating pathology. Using the NIMH Research Domain Criteria as a guide, the current article reviews theories, behavioral and self-report assessments, and empirical findings related to reward learning in the eating disorders.

Recent findings: Data from behavioral tasks suggest deficits in reinforcement learning, which may become more pronounced with increasing disorder severity and duration. Self-report data strongly implicate positive eating and thinness/restriction expectancies (an element of reward prediction error) in the onset and maintenance of eating pathology. Finally, self-report measures of habit strength demonstrate relationships with eating pathology and illness duration; however, behavioral task data do not support relationships between eating pathology and a propensity towards general habit development. Existing studies are limited, but provide preliminary support for the presence of abnormal reward learning in eating disorders. Continued research is needed to address identified gaps in the literature.

Keywords: Eating disorders; Expectancy; Habit; Prediction error; Reinforcement learning; Reward.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance
    1. Hudson JI, Hiripi E, Pope HG, Kessler RC. The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;61(3):348–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040 . - DOI
    1. Atwood ME, Friedman A. A systematic review of enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT-E) for eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2020;53(3):311–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23206 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Linardon J, Fairburn CG, Fitzsimmons-Craft EE, Wilfley DE, Brennan L. The empirical status of the third-wave behaviour therapies for the treatment of eating disorders: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017;58:125–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.10.005 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dawe S, Loxton NJ. The role of impulsivity in the development of substance use and eating disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28(3):343–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.007 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davis C, Woodside DB. Sensitivity to the rewarding effects of food and exercise in the eating disorders. Compr Psychiatry. 2002;43(3):189–94. https://doi.org/10.1053/comp.2002.32356 . - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources