Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;278(11):4209-4216.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06504-8. Epub 2021 Jan 2.

Comparison of bandaging techniques to prevent cochlear implant magnet displacement following MRI

Affiliations

Comparison of bandaging techniques to prevent cochlear implant magnet displacement following MRI

Martin Leinung et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: For cochlear implants (CI) with removable magnets, a pressure bandage usually is recommended during MR imaging to avoid magnet dislocation. Nevertheless, this complication is regularly observed despite applying a pressure bandage. The aim of this study was to compare various bandaging techniques to avoid magnet displacement.

Materials and methods: As an experimental model a force measuring stand was developed and validated, on which the process of magnet dislocation could be simulated on a cochlear implant. In a test series with six combinations of cohesive and elastic bandages with different counter pressure elements (CPE), the forces required to induce magnet dislocation against the resistance of a compression bandage was determined. In addition, the inter- and intraindividual variability of the compression bandages was measured for ten different users.

Results: The cohesive bandage had the lowest average holding force of 10.70 N. The elastic bandage developed more than four times the retention force of the cohesive bandage (44.88 N, p < 0.01). By adding a CPE, these values could be increased highly significantly up to factor 3. The optimum combination in terms of fixation force against magnet dislocation was an elastic bandage plus a cylindrical CPE (76.60 N). The data showed a high interindividual variability.

Conclusion: Even though most CI manufacturers now offer 3T-conditional implants, a pressure bandage will have to be applied to thousands of patients with previous implant generations to prevent magnet dislocation. We examined for the first time force measurements to compare different bandaging techniques by detecting the holding force of the CI magnet. We were able to identify an optimized combination of a bandage and a CPE to immobilize the CI magnet. However, our data also demonstrated a significant scatter amongst different examiners. Although our data provide valuable data for potential clinical application, future development of the dressing technique is required for human use.

Keywords: Cochlear implant; Compression bandage; Force measurement; MR imaging; Magnet dislocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carlson ML (2020) Cochlear implantation in adults. N Engl J Med 382(16):1531–1542. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1904407 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deep NL, Dowling EM, Jethanamest D, Carlson ML (2019) Cochlear implantation: an overview. J Neurol Surg Part B Skull base 80(2):169–177. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669411 - DOI
    1. von Ilberg CA, Baumann U, Kiefer J, Tillein J, Adunka OF (2011) Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade. Audiol Neuro-otol 16(Suppl 2):1–30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000327765 - DOI
    1. Rinck P. Magnetic resonance in medicine. A critical introduction. Published online 2018
    1. Bundesamt S. Fallpauschalenbezogene Krankenhausstatistik (DRG-Statistik) Diagnosen, Prozeduren und Fallpauschalen der vollstationären Patientinnen und Patienten in Krankenhäusern 2008. Published online 2009.

LinkOut - more resources