Comparison of bandaging techniques to prevent cochlear implant magnet displacement following MRI
- PMID: 33386972
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06504-8
Comparison of bandaging techniques to prevent cochlear implant magnet displacement following MRI
Abstract
Introduction: For cochlear implants (CI) with removable magnets, a pressure bandage usually is recommended during MR imaging to avoid magnet dislocation. Nevertheless, this complication is regularly observed despite applying a pressure bandage. The aim of this study was to compare various bandaging techniques to avoid magnet displacement.
Materials and methods: As an experimental model a force measuring stand was developed and validated, on which the process of magnet dislocation could be simulated on a cochlear implant. In a test series with six combinations of cohesive and elastic bandages with different counter pressure elements (CPE), the forces required to induce magnet dislocation against the resistance of a compression bandage was determined. In addition, the inter- and intraindividual variability of the compression bandages was measured for ten different users.
Results: The cohesive bandage had the lowest average holding force of 10.70 N. The elastic bandage developed more than four times the retention force of the cohesive bandage (44.88 N, p < 0.01). By adding a CPE, these values could be increased highly significantly up to factor 3. The optimum combination in terms of fixation force against magnet dislocation was an elastic bandage plus a cylindrical CPE (76.60 N). The data showed a high interindividual variability.
Conclusion: Even though most CI manufacturers now offer 3T-conditional implants, a pressure bandage will have to be applied to thousands of patients with previous implant generations to prevent magnet dislocation. We examined for the first time force measurements to compare different bandaging techniques by detecting the holding force of the CI magnet. We were able to identify an optimized combination of a bandage and a CPE to immobilize the CI magnet. However, our data also demonstrated a significant scatter amongst different examiners. Although our data provide valuable data for potential clinical application, future development of the dressing technique is required for human use.
Keywords: Cochlear implant; Compression bandage; Force measurement; MR imaging; Magnet dislocation.
© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Prospective study on magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant patients.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Mar;281(3):1231-1242. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08224-1. Epub 2023 Sep 14. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 37707616 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear Implant Magnet Dislocation: Simulations and Measurements of Force and Torque at 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Ear Hear. 2021 Sep/Oct;42(5):1276-1283. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001013. Ear Hear. 2021. PMID: 33657576
-
Cochlear implant magnet dislocation after MRI: surgical management and outcome.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 May;277(5):1297-1304. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05826-x. Epub 2020 Feb 1. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 32008075
-
First MRI With New Cochlear Implant With Rotatable Internal Magnet System and Proposal for Standardization of Reporting Magnet-Related Artifact Size.Otol Neurotol. 2019 Aug;40(7):883-891. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002269. Otol Neurotol. 2019. PMID: 31219967 Review.
-
Case report: traumatic displacement of a cochlear implant magnet.Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014 Apr;123(4):229-31. doi: 10.1177/0003489414525922. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014. PMID: 24671476 Review.
Cited by
-
Prospective study on magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant patients.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Mar;281(3):1231-1242. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08224-1. Epub 2023 Sep 14. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 37707616 Free PMC article.
-
The First Report of Using Low-Field MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy in a Patient With a Cochlear Implant.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023 Dec 10;9(4):101416. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101416. eCollection 2024 Apr. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023. PMID: 38406390 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Complications of cochlear implants with MRI scans in different body regions: type, frequency and impact.Insights Imaging. 2023 Jan 16;14(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01353-x. Insights Imaging. 2023. PMID: 36645551 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Carlson ML (2020) Cochlear implantation in adults. N Engl J Med 382(16):1531–1542. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1904407 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Deep NL, Dowling EM, Jethanamest D, Carlson ML (2019) Cochlear implantation: an overview. J Neurol Surg Part B Skull base 80(2):169–177. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669411 - DOI
-
- von Ilberg CA, Baumann U, Kiefer J, Tillein J, Adunka OF (2011) Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade. Audiol Neuro-otol 16(Suppl 2):1–30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000327765 - DOI
-
- Rinck P. Magnetic resonance in medicine. A critical introduction. Published online 2018
-
- Bundesamt S. Fallpauschalenbezogene Krankenhausstatistik (DRG-Statistik) Diagnosen, Prozeduren und Fallpauschalen der vollstationären Patientinnen und Patienten in Krankenhäusern 2008. Published online 2009.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous