Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 2;23(1):8.
doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-00991-y.

Considerations in Surgical Management of Gastrointestinal Cancer in Older Patients

Nicole M Saur  1 , Isacco Montroni  2 , Riccardo A Audisio  3
Affiliations
Review

Considerations in Surgical Management of Gastrointestinal Cancer in Older Patients

Nicole M Saur et al. Curr Oncol Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The goal of this manuscript is to present new and thought-provoking information related to the surgical care of older patients. We focused on four main areas including communication, surgical pathways, the care of emergency surgery patients, and functional recovery and quality of life. We sought to answer how these areas have evolved, affecting the care of older patients.

Recent findings: Older patients with cancer present particular challenges in relation to communication, goals, surgical treatment, and post-surgical outcomes. Communication should be clear early and during the treatment course. A multidisciplinary, multimodality, multi-phase pathway can be utilized to improve the postoperative outcomes of older patients with cancer. Functional recovery and quality of life can and should be measured in this population. Communication is complicated in cancer patients, which is made more complex with advancing age. Communication is the cornerstone of the treatment of older patients. Future research should focus on interventions to improve communication and measure quality of life and functional recovery metrics.

Keywords: Cancer; Communication; Older adults; Outcomes; Prehabilitation; Surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
    1. Simmonds PD, Best L, George S, Baughan C, Buchanan R, Davis C, et al. Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Lancet. 2000;356(9234):968–74.
    1. Eguchi T, Bains S, Lee MC, Tan KS, Hristov B, Buitrago DH, et al. Impact of increasing age on cause-specific mortality and morbidity in patients with stage I non–small-cell lung cancer: a competing risks analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(3):281–90. - PubMed
    1. Balducci L, Stanta G. Cancer in the frail patient. A coming epidemic. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2000;14(1):235–50 xi. - PubMed
    1. Walter LC, Covinsky KE. Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. JAMA. 2001;285(21):2750–6. - PubMed
    1. Audisio RA, Balch CM. Why can’t surgeons treat older patients the same as younger patients? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(13):4123–5. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources