Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb;12(1):45-59.
doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00433-9. Epub 2021 Jan 2.

Application of ultrasound for muscle assessment in sarcopenia: 2020 SARCUS update

Affiliations
Review

Application of ultrasound for muscle assessment in sarcopenia: 2020 SARCUS update

Stany Perkisas et al. Eur Geriatr Med. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: In 2018, the SARCUS working group published a first article on the standardization of the use of ultrasound to assess muscle. Recommendations were made for patient positioning, system settings and components to be measured. Also, shortcomings in knowledge were mentioned. An important issue that still required standardization was the definition of anatomical landmarks for many muscles.

Methods: A systematic search was performed in Medline, SCOPUS and Web of Sciences looking for all articles describing the use of ultrasound in the assessment of muscle not described in the first recommendations, published from 01/01/2018 until 31/01/2020. All relevant terms used for older people, ultrasound and muscles were used.

Results: For 39 muscles, different approaches for ultrasound assessment were found that likely impact the values measured. Standardized anatomical landmarks and measuring points were proposed for all muscles/muscle groups. Besides the five already known muscle parameters (muscle thickness, cross-section area, pennation angle, fascicle length and echo-intensity), four new parameters are discussed (muscle volume, stiffness, contraction potential and microcirculation). The former SARCUS article recommendations are updated with this new information that includes new muscle groups.

Conclusions: The emerging field of ultrasound assessment of muscle mass only highlights the need for a standardization of measurement technique. In this article, guidelines are updated and broadened to provide standardization instructions for a large number of muscles.

Keywords: Assessment; Muscle; Protocol; SARCUS; Sarcopenia; Ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ et al (2019) Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 48(1):16–31 - DOI
    1. McGregor RA, Cameron-Smith D, Poppitt SD (2014) It is not just muscle mass: a review of muscle quality, composition and metabolism during ageing as determinants of muscle function and mobility in later life. Longev Healthspan 3(1):9 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Reinders I et al (2016) Muscle quality and myosteatosis: novel associations with mortality risk: the age, gene/environment susceptibility (AGES)-Reykjavik study. Am J Epidemiol 183(1):53–60 - PubMed
    1. Beaudart C et al (2016) Sarcopenia in daily practice: assessment and management. BMC Geriatr 16(1):170 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Nijholt W et al (2017) The reliability and validity of ultrasound to quantify muscles in older adults: a systematic review. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 8(5):702–712 - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources