Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jan 2;20(1):2.
doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00657-2.

The effects of a family-centered psychosocial-based nutrition intervention in patients with advanced cancer: the PiCNIC2 pilot randomised controlled trial

Alex Molassiotis  1 , Teresa Brown  2 , Hui Lin Cheng  3 , Angela Byrnes  2 , Raymond Javan Chan  4   5 , David Wyld  2   4   6 , Melissa Eastgate  2   6 , Patsy Yates  4 , Andrea P Marshall  7   8 , Rebecca Fichera  2 , Liz Isenring  9 , Ki Fung To  10 , Po Shan Ko  11 , Wang Lam  12 , Yuk Fong Lam  12 , Lai Fan Au  13 , Raymond See-Kit Lo  13
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The effects of a family-centered psychosocial-based nutrition intervention in patients with advanced cancer: the PiCNIC2 pilot randomised controlled trial

Alex Molassiotis et al. Nutr J. .

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition in advanced cancer patients is common but limited and inconclusive data exists on the effectiveness of nutrition interventions. Feasibility and acceptability of a novel family-based nutritional psychosocial intervention were established recently. The aims of this present study were to assess the feasibility of undertaking a randomised controlled trial of the latter intervention, to pilot test outcome measures and to explore preliminary outcomes.

Methods: Pilot randomised controlled trial recruiting advanced cancer patients and family caregivers in Australia and Hong Kong. Participants were randomised and assigned to one of two groups, either a family-centered nutritional intervention or the control group receiving usual care only. The intervention provided 2-3 h of direct dietitian contact time with patients and family members over a 4-6-week period. During the intervention, issues with nutrition impact symptoms and food or eating-related psychosocial concerns were addressed through nutrition counselling, with a focus on improving nutrition-related communication between the dyads and setting nutritional goals. Feasibility assessment included recruitment, consent rate, retention rate, and acceptability of assessment tools. Validated nutritional and quality of life self-reported measures were used to collect patient and caregiver outcome data, including the 3-day food diary, the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form, the Functional Assessment Anorexia/Cachexia scale, Eating-related Distress or Enjoyment, and measures of self-efficacy, carers' distress, anxiety and depression.

Results: Seventy-four patients and 54 family caregivers participated in the study. Recruitment was challenging, and for every patient agreeing to participate, 14-31 patients had to be screened. The consent rate was 44% in patients and 55% in caregivers. Only half the participants completed the trial's final assessment. The data showed promise for some patient outcomes in the intervention group, particularly with improvements in eating-related distress (p = 0.046 in the Australian data; p = 0.07 in the Hong Kong data), eating-related enjoyment (p = 0.024, Hong Kong data) and quality of life (p = 0.045, Australian data). Energy and protein intake also increased in a clinically meaningful way. Caregiver data on eating-related distress, anxiety, depression and caregiving burden, however, showed little or no change.

Conclusions: Despite challenges with participant recruitment, the intervention demonstrates good potential to have positive effects on patients' nutritional status and eating-related distress. The results of this trial warrant a larger and fully-powered trial to ascertain the effectiveness of this intervention.

Trial registration: The trial was registered with the Australian & New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, registration number ACTRN12618001352291 .

Keywords: Advanced cancer; Anorexia; Caregivers; Eating-related distress; Malnutrition; Quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare no competing interests by any of the authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT recruitment flow diagram (Australian site)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CONSORT recruitment flow diagram (Hong Kong site)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(5):489–495. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Segura A, Pardo J, Jara C, Zugazabeitia L, Carulla J, de las Peñas R, et al. An epidemiological evaluation of the prevalence of malnutrition in Spanish patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer. Clin Nutr. 2005;24(5):801–814. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.05.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aktas A, Walsh D, Galang M, O’Donoghue N, Rybicki L, Hullihen B, Schleckman E. Underrecognition of Malnutrition in Advanced Cancer The Role of the Dietitian and Clinical Practice Variations. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2016. 10.1177/1049909116639969. - PubMed
    1. Teunissen SC, Wesker W, Kruitwagen C, de Haes HC, Voest EE, de Graeff A. Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007;34(1):94–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amano K, Maeda I, Morita T, Okajima Y, Hama T, Aoyama M, et al. Eating-related distress and need for nutritional support of families of advanced cancer patients: a nationwide survey of bereaved family members. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016;7(5):527–534. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12102. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types