Is Physical Alteration a Sufficient Reason to Prohibit Ritual Infant Circumcision?
- PMID: 33389480
- DOI: 10.1007/s10943-020-01139-9
Is Physical Alteration a Sufficient Reason to Prohibit Ritual Infant Circumcision?
Abstract
European culture and thought have long disfavored ritual child circumcision, which is obligatory to Jews and Muslims. Much opposition to this practice hinges on the notion that it represents an unwarranted unconsented physical assault on the child. This article takes issue with that conclusion. Furthermore, even if one were to grant this conclusion, the offense is not of sufficient magnitude to warrant government action to halt the practice. On the other hand, suppression of ritual child circumcision may represent an attack against cultures and societies in which circumcision is practiced.
Keywords: Autonomy; Circumcision; Judaism; Kant; Physical alteration.
References
-
- Abramitzky, R. (2011). Lessons from the kibbutz on the equality–incentives trade-off. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(1), 185–208.
-
- Adler, A., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Using wellbeing for public policy: Theory, measurement, and Recommendations. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(1), 1–35.
-
- Alperin, R. M. (2016). Jewish self-hatred: The internalization of prejudice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 44(3), 221–230.
-
- Al-Sabbagh, M. L. (1996). Islamic ruling on male and female circumcision. World Health Organization. Retrieved March 28, 2020, from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/119559/dsa54.pdf?sequenc... .
-
- Audi, R. (2011). Democratic authority and the separation of church and state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
