Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 18:11:607171.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.607171. eCollection 2020.

Somaclonal Variation in Chrysanthemum × morifolium Protoplast Regenerants

Affiliations

Somaclonal Variation in Chrysanthemum × morifolium Protoplast Regenerants

Tom Eeckhaut et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Chrysanthemum × morifolium protoplasts were isolated and regenerated to assess possible protoclonal variation in the regenerants. After a preliminary screening of the potential of different regeneration systems for protoplast regeneration, we produced a series of cut chrysanthemum 'Arjuna' leaf protoplast regenerants through liquid culture. Regenerants (54) were vegetatively propagated and grown under a commercial production system in 2 different seasons. All screened regenerants were significantly affected with regard to either flower number, flower size, flower weight, leaf weight, stalk weight, or plant size. A significant plant size reduction in 43/52 and 48/49 regenerants for both seasons was the most recorded effect. Also a reduction in flowering induction time up to 10 days, altered flower types and colors were observed. Differences between growing seasons were notable. Possible molecular backgrounds including genome size variation and commercial applications in breeding of chrysanthemum are discussed.

Keywords: Asteraceae; flower traits; genome size; in vitro; ornamentals; phenotype; plant breeding; protoclonal variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Experimental setup. In experiment 1, 16 cut and pot Chrysanthemum × morifolium cultivars were selected and the regeneration potential of protoplasts from 2 different tissues was tested in 2 different culture systems. A regeneration system (cultivar × tissue type × culture type) was selected. The regenerants of the selected cultivar were further referred to as the AR-series. Following, a larger regenerant batch (RS series) was produced through the selected system. In experiment 2, mother plants were grown from all AR and RS regenerants and used for cutting production. These cuttings were compared to the original cultivar through assessment of phenotypic parameters. For a second and independent assessment, new mother plants were produced from the old ones.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Morphological variation in Chrysanthemum × morifolium protoplast regenerants: (A) ‘Golden Surfer’ regenerants GSR1, GSR2, and GSR7, all with compact growth and delayed flowering; (B) ‘Le Bonheur’ regenerants LBR1 (normal phenotype), LBR3 (advanced flower bud formation), and LBR5 (compact growth, deformed leaves).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Chrysanthemum × morifolium ‘Arjuna’ protoplast regenerants, different phenotypes in 2017: (A) overview of phenotypic greenhouse trials; (B) V-C leaves; (C) AR5 leaves; (D) AR14 leaves; (E) V-C flower; (F) yellowish disk florets (RS25); (G) greenish disk florets and tubular-type flower (RS37); (H) reddish ray florets [RS48(2017)_2]. Scale bar = 5 cm.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Phenotypic screening of Chrysanthemum × morifolium ‘Arjuna’ protoplast regenerants: density plots for parameters RT3 (retention time 3), FN (flower number), FS (flower size), FW (flower weight), LW (leaf weight), SW (stalk weight), and PS (plant size) independently assessed in August 2017 (blue) and May 2018 (brown). Controls are indicated.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Pearson correlation matrix of phenotypic parameters FN (flower number), FS (flower size), FW (flower weight), LW (leaf weight), SW (stalk weight), and PS (plant size) assessed on Chrysanthemum × morifolium ‘Arjuna’ protoplast regenerants in 2 independent trials in 2017 (upper value) and 2018 (lower value). Significant correlations (P < 0.05) are labeled with *.

References

    1. Adedeji O., Naing A., Kim C. (2020). Protoplast isolation and shoot regeneration from protoplast-derived calli of Chrysanthemum cv. white ND. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 141 571–581. 10.1007/s11240-020-01816-3 - DOI
    1. Anderson N. (2006). “Chrysanthemum, Dendranthema x grandiflora tzvelv,” in Flower Breeding and Genetics: Issues, Challenges, and Opportunities for the 21st Century, ed. Anderson N. (Dordrecht: Springer; ), 379–427.
    1. Bairu M., Aremu A., Van Staden J. (2011). Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods. Plant Growth Regul. 63 147–173. 10.1007/s10725-010-9554-x - DOI
    1. Barceló M., Wallin A., Medina J., Gil-Ariza D., López-Casado G., Juarez J., et al. (2019). Isolation and culture of strawberry protoplasts and field evaluation of regenerated plants. Sci. Hort. 256:108552 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108552 - DOI
    1. Bednarek P., Orlowska R. (2019). Plant tissue culture environment as a switch-key of (epi)genetic changes. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 140 245–257. 10.1007/s11240-019-01724-1 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources