Safety and performance of the EverProTM everolimus-eluting coronary stent system with biodegradable polymer in a real-world scenario
- PMID: 33391614
- PMCID: PMC7754385
- DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v12.i12.615
Safety and performance of the EverProTM everolimus-eluting coronary stent system with biodegradable polymer in a real-world scenario
Abstract
Background: The EverProTM (Sahajanand Laser Technology Ltd., India) everolimus-eluting coronary stent system (EES) is a second-generation drug-eluting stent with a biodegradable polymer.
Aim: To determine the safety and performance of the EverProTM EES in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) during a 1-year clinical follow-up.
Methods: This observational, retrospective, single-center study enrolled patients who had been implanted with the EverProTM stent between June 1, 2018 and January 31, 2019, and had completed a 1-year follow-up period after the index procedure. The primary clinical endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 6 mo defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints were the incidence of TLR at 1, 6 and 12 mo follow-up, MACE at 1 and 12 mo follow-up, and stent thrombosis up to 1 year after the index procedure.
Results: The study population comprised 77 patients (98 lesions). A total of 37 (48.1%) patients had comorbid hypertension. In total, 26 (33.8%) patients presented with ST segment elevation MI and 10.4% patients with non-ST segment elevation MI. Treated lesions were located mainly in the left anterior descending artery (49%) followed by the right coronary artery (29.6%), left circumflex (12.2%) and obtuse marginal (9.2%) arteries. The majority of patients were with single-vessel disease (79%), 22.2% of lesions had a mild to severe thrombus load, and 94.9% were American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association type B or C. De novo stenting was performed in 96.9% of patients and 3% were treated for in-stent restenosis. Procedural success was attained in all patients. In-hospital or follow-up MACE and stent thrombosis were not reported during the 1-year follow-up period.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that the EverProTM EES is a safe and effective treatment option with no MACE or stent thrombosis reported during the 1-year study period in patients with CAD.
Keywords: Coronary artery disease; Everolimus; Major adverse cardiac event; Retrospective, EverProTM, Myocardial infarction.
©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: Vani P, Patel A, Salgotra V are employees of Sahajanand Laser Technology Ltd., and Dr. Trimukhe R is an employee of Atma Malik Hospital. The authors do not have any other conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Jayashree S, Arindam M, Vijay KV. Genetic epidemiology of coronary artery disease: an Asian Indian perspective. J Genet. 2015;94:539–549. - PubMed
-
- Drachman DE. Clinical experience with drug-eluting stents. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2002;3 Suppl 5:S31–S37. - PubMed
-
- Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, Fajadet J, Ban Hayashi E, Perin M, Colombo A, Schuler G, Barragan P, Guagliumi G, Molnàr F, Falotico R RAVEL Study Group. Randomized Study with the Sirolimus-Coated Bx Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients with de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1773–1780. - PubMed
-
- Daemen J, Wenaweser P, Tsuchida K, Abrecht L, Vaina S, Morger C, Kukreja N, Jüni P, Sianos G, Hellige G, van Domburg RT, Hess OM, Boersma E, Meier B, Windecker S, Serruys PW. Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study. Lancet. 2007;369:667–678. - PubMed
-
- Kang SH, Park KW, Kang DY, Lim WH, Park KT, Han JK, Kang HJ, Koo BK, Oh BH, Park YB, Kandzari DE, Cohen DJ, Hwang SS, Kim HS. Biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents vs. bare metal stents vs. durable-polymer drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and Bayesian approach network meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:1147–1158. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous