Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 18:8:620735.
doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.620735. eCollection 2020.

Insights Into the Complexity of Craniofacial Development From a Cellular Perspective

Affiliations
Review

Insights Into the Complexity of Craniofacial Development From a Cellular Perspective

Andrea P Murillo-Rincón et al. Front Cell Dev Biol. .

Abstract

The head represents the most complex part of the body and a distinctive feature of the vertebrate body plan. This intricate structure is assembled during embryonic development in the four-dimensional process of morphogenesis. The head integrates components of the central and peripheral nervous system, sensory organs, muscles, joints, glands, and other specialized tissues in the framework of a complexly shaped skull. The anterior part of the head is referred to as the face, and a broad spectrum of facial shapes across vertebrate species enables different feeding strategies, communication styles, and diverse specialized functions. The face formation starts early during embryonic development and is an enormously complex, multi-step process regulated on a genomic, molecular, and cellular level. In this review, we will discuss recent discoveries that revealed new aspects of facial morphogenesis from the time of the neural crest cell emergence till the formation of the chondrocranium, the primary design of the individual facial shape. We will focus on molecular mechanisms of cell fate specification, the role of individual and collective cell migration, the importance of dynamic and continuous cellular interactions, responses of cells and tissues to generated physical forces, and their morphogenetic outcomes. In the end, we will examine the spatiotemporal activity of signaling centers tightly regulating the release of signals inducing the formation of craniofacial skeletal elements. The existence of these centers and their regulation by enhancers represent one of the core morphogenetic mechanisms and might lay the foundations for intra- and inter-species facial variability.

Keywords: cellular behavior; chondrocranium; craniofacial development; facial shape; mesenchymal condensations; neural crest; signaling centers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Panel I: Specification and cell fate acquisition of the neural crest cells (NCCs). (A) NCCs and placode progenitor cells are localized adjacent to each other at the neural plate border. (B) When neural folds are brought together, the stiffened mesoderm underlying the cranial NCCs (red arrows) triggers NCC EMT and initiate NCC migration. (C) The migrating NCCs undergo a gradual process of cell fate acquisition, during which the NCCs pass through two main bifurcation points. The first separation leads to the split of sensory and autonomic/mesenchymal fates, and the second separation leads to the emergence of autonomic and mesenchymal fates. Placode progenitors are split from the common PPR into individual placodes to give rise to different sensory organs or cranial ganglia. (D) NCCs migration streams and placode separation are a result of the interaction between NCCs and placode cells (middle): NCCs are attracted by placode cells (green arrows), after their direct contact placode cells are repolarized and move away from the NCCs (orange arrows), in a process called contact inhibition locomotion (CIL). Due to their active directed cell migration (orange arrows, below), the individual placode territories are established and NCCs had along their stereotypical migratory pathways. (A–C) Upper row transversal view, lower row: dorsal view; (D) lateral view. Panel II: Cellular behavior during early craniofacial morphogenesis. (A) The cranial NCCs migrated into their respective destinations and proliferate generating facial ectomesenchyme. (B) The progeny of each cranial NCC occupies a 3D area referred to as the clonal envelope. NCCs undergo cell divisions in an oriented manner, the shapes of clonal envelopes reflect the anisotropic growth of the head. The mesenchymal condensations originate from the local ectomesenchyme and represent the blueprint for chondrocranium and future facial shape. Extensive cell proliferation in quite distant locations results in collective cell movement translocating the whole micro-domains. (C) The mesenchymal condensations start differentiating into cartilage, the chondrocytes undergo a series of polarized cell divisions resulting in surface expansion of the chondrocranium. (D) Polarized cell division of NCC-derived ectomesenchyme is controlled by Wnt/Planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway and its disruption leads to shorter and wider facial proportions. The Blue asterisk shows the relevant time point of the Wnt/PCP signaling effect – during the proliferation of ectomesenchyme (panel IIB). Panel III: Signaling centers establish facial geometry. (A) Signaling centers located in the developing brain instruct the formation of mesenchymal condensations from the ectomesenchyme. (B) Sonic hedgehog (Shh) from the floor plate induces the condensation leading to the formation of nasal septum as well some elements of the cranial base, while morphogenetic signals from the olfactory epithelium induce the formation of nasal capsule roof. (C) Removal of morphogenetic signals from distinct locations results in the absence or malformation of the respective cartilaginous structures.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abramyan J. (2019). Hedgehog signaling and embryonic craniofacial disorders. J. Dev. Biol. 7:9. 10.3390/jdb7020009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abzhanov A., Cordero D. R., Sen J., Tabin C. J., Helms J. A. (2007). Cross–regulatory interactions between Fgf8 and Shh in the avian frontonasal prominence. Congenit. Anom. 47 136–148. 10.1111/j.1741-4520.2007.00162.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adhikari K., Fuentes-Guajardo M., Quinto-Sánchez M., Mendoza-Revilla J., Camilo Chacón-Duque J., Acuña-Alonzo V., et al. (2016). A genome-wide association scan implicates DCHS2, RUNX2, GLI3, PAX1 and EDAR in human facial variation. Nat. Commun. 7:11616. 10.1038/ncomms11616 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Attanasio C., Nord A. S., Zhu Y., Blow M. J., Li Z., Liberton D. K., et al. (2013). Fine tuning of craniofacial morphology by distant-acting enhancers. Science 342:1241006. 10.1126/science.1241006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baggiolini A., Varum S., Mateos J. M., Bettosini D., John N., Bonalli M., et al. (2015). Premigratory and migratory neural crest cells are multipotent in vivo. Cell Stem Cell 16 314–322. 10.1016/j.stem.2015.02.017 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources