Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;32(3):221-230.
doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01376-z. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

Revisiting time to translation: implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in cancer control

Shahnaz Khan  1   2 , David Chambers  3 , Gila Neta  3
Affiliations

Revisiting time to translation: implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in cancer control

Shahnaz Khan et al. Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Previous studies estimate translation of research evidence into practice takes 17 years. However, this estimate is not specific to cancer control evidence-based practices (EBPs), nor do these studies evaluate variation in the translational process. We examined the translational pathway of cancer control EBPs.

Methods: We selected five cancer control EBPs where data on uptake were readily available. Years from landmark publication to clinical guideline issuance to implementation, defined as 50% uptake, were measured. The translational pathway for each EBP was mapped and an average total time across EBPs was calculated.

Results: Five cancer control EBPs were included: mammography, clinicians' advice to quit smoking, colorectal cancer screening, HPV co-testing, and HPV vaccination. Time from publication to implementation ranged from 13 to 21 years, averaging 15 years. Time from publication to guideline issuance ranged from 3 to 17 years, and from guideline issuance to implementation, - 4 to 12 years. Clinician's advice to quit smoking, HPV co-testing, and HPV vaccination were most rapidly implemented; colorectal cancer screening and mammography were slowest to implement.

Conclusion: The average time to implementation was 15 years for the five EBPs we evaluated, a marginal improvement from prior findings. Although newer EBPs such as HPV vaccination and HPV co-testing were faster to implement than other EBPs, continued efforts in implementation science to speed research to practice are needed.

Keywords: Cancer control; Evidence-based practice; Implementation; Translation; Uptake.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Balas EA, Boren SA (2000) Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. In: Bemmel J, McCray AT (eds) Yearbook of medical informatics 2000: patient-centered systems. Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart, Germany, pp 65–70
    1. Grant J, Green L, Mason B (2003) Basic research and health: a reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical science. Res Eval 12(3):217–224 - DOI
    1. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J (2011) The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med 104(12):510–520. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Reccomendations for Primary Care Practice. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/recommendations
    1. National Cancer Institute: Cancer Trends Progress Report. https://progressreport.cancer.gov/ . https://progressreport.cancer.gov/

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources