Efficacy of continuous monitoring of maternal temperature during labor using wireless axillary sensors
- PMID: 33394269
- DOI: 10.1007/s10877-020-00625-5
Efficacy of continuous monitoring of maternal temperature during labor using wireless axillary sensors
Abstract
Neonatal early onset sepsis (EOS) occurs in 0.5-0.8/1000 live births and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Its presenting signs in newborns are non-specific, so risk assessment before birth is essential. Maternal fever during labor is the strongest predictor of EOS, but the current standard is for infrequent manual determinations of temperature. We aimed to determine whether continuous measurement of temperature during labor is feasible, accurate, and more effective than manual measurements for detecting fever. Women were recruited on admission in labor at > 35 weeks gestational age, with < 6 cm cervical dilation. Sensors were affixed in the axilla, which transmitted every 4 minutes by Bluetooth to a dedicated tablet. Conventional temperature measurements were taken every 3-6 hours per routine. Of 336 subjects recruited, 155 had both > 4 hours of continuous data and > 2 manual temperature measurements and were included for analysis. Continuous recordings were feasible and correlated well with manual measurements independent of mean temperature. Of 15 episodes of fever > 38 °C detected by both methods, 13 were detected earlier by continuous (9 of those more than 1 hour earlier). Manual measurements missed 32 fevers > 38 °C and 13 fevers > 38.5 °C that were identified by continuous. Continuous measurement of maternal temperature for the duration of labor is practical and accurate. It may be more sensitive for identifying infants at risk for EOS than the current practice, enabling earlier and more effective targeted treatment of affected infants.
Keywords: Labor; Neonatal early-onset sepsis; Wireless monitoring.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Puopolo KM, Draper D, Wi S, Newman TB, Zupancic J, Lieberman E, Smith M, Escobar GJ. Estimating the probability of neonatal early-onset infection on the basis of maternal risk factors. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e1155–63. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3464 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Gong CL, Dasgupta-Tsinikas S, Zangwill KM, Bolaris M, Hay JM. Early onset sepsis calculator-based management of newborns exposed to maternal intrapartum fever: a cost benefit analysis. J Perinatol. 2019;39:571–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0316-y . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Leenen JPL, Leerentveld C, van Dijk JD, van Westreenen HL, Schoonhoven L, Patijn GA. Current evidence for continuous vital signs monitoring by wearable wireless devices in hospitalized adults: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e18636. https://doi.org/10.2196/18636 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Hall MJ, DeFrances CJ, Williams SN, Golosinskiy A, Schwartzman A. National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2007 summary. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2010;29:1–20.
-
- Boatin AA, Wylie BJ, Goldfarb I, Azevedo R, Pittel E, Ng C, Haberer JE. Wireless vital sign monitoring in pregnant women: A functionality and acceptability study. Telemedicine e-Health. 2016;22:564–71. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2015.0173 . - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical