Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 1;96(1):134-141.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003604.

The Role of Power in Health Care Conflict: Recommendations for Shifting Toward Constructive Approaches

Affiliations

The Role of Power in Health Care Conflict: Recommendations for Shifting Toward Constructive Approaches

Naike Bochatay et al. Acad Med. .

Abstract

Purpose: The combination of power and conflict is frequently reported to have a detrimental impact on communication and on patient care, and it is avoided and perceived negatively by health care professionals. In view of recent recommendations to explicitly address power and conflict in health professions education, adopting more constructive approaches toward power and conflict may be helpful. This study examined the role of power in conflicts between health care professionals in different cultural contexts to make recommendations for promoting more constructive approaches.

Method: The authors used social bases of power (positional, expert, informational, reward, coercive, referent) identified in the literature to examine the role of power in conflicts between health care professionals in different cultural settings. They drew upon semistructured interviews conducted from 2013 to 2016 with 249 health care professionals working at health centers in the United States, Switzerland, and Hungary, in which participants shared stories of conflict they had experienced with coworkers. The authors used a directed approach to content analysis to analyze the data.

Results: The social bases of power tended to be comparable across sites and included positional, expert, and coercive power. The rigid hierarchies that divide health care professionals, their professions, and their specialties contributed to negative experiences in conflicts. In addition, the presence of an audience, such as supervisors, coworkers, patients, and patients' families, prevented health care professionals from addressing conflicts when they occurred, resulting in conflict escalation.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that fostering more positive approaches toward power and conflict could be achieved by using social bases of power such as referent power and by addressing conflicts in a more private, backstage, manner.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kreindler SA, Dowd DA, Dana Star N, Gottschalk T. Silos and social identity: The social identity approach as a framework for understanding and overcoming divisions in health care. Milbank Q. 2012;90:347–374.
    1. Hall P. Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(suppl 1):188–196.
    1. Kuper A, Veinot P, Leavitt J, et al. Epistemology, culture, justice and power: Non-bioscientific knowledge for medical training. Med Educ. 2017;51:158–173.
    1. Parsons T. On the concept of political power. Proc Am Philos Soc. 1963;107:232–262.
    1. Dahl RA. The concept of power. Syst Res. 1957 (2007)2:201–215.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources