Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 1;34(2):118-125.
doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000713.

Molecular diagnostic methods for pneumonia: how can they be applied in practice?

Affiliations
Review

Molecular diagnostic methods for pneumonia: how can they be applied in practice?

Solen Kerneis et al. Curr Opin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Pneumonia represents a major burden in clinical practice. A rapid etiological diagnosis is critical for optimizing the antibiotic use. Owing to the variety of possible pathogens and the time needed for bacterial cultures or usual polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, timely and precise diagnosis is a huge challenge. Several new rapid multiplex assays have been developed in the last decade to resolve these issues. This review aims to provide an overview of recent evidence on improvements and limitations of new rapid molecular assays for pneumonia.

Recent findings: Several rapid multiplex-PCR assays are commercially available for upper or lower respiratory tract samples, allowing detection of a wide range of respiratory viruses, bacteria, and, in some cases, of several antibiotic resistance genes. Clinical evaluations demonstrated their good correlation with gold-standard assays but their lack of exhaustiveness, especially for hospital-acquired pneumonia. Studies that evaluated their potential benefits on antibiotic use suffered from important weaknesses with conflicting and limited results.

Summary: New molecular assays may enable improvements in patient management and antibiotic use. Available studies highlight several benefits and the strong interrelations needed between microbiologists and physicians for their implementation and interpretation according to the clinical and epidemiological context.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03452826 NCT03943732 NCT04158492 NCT04153682 NCT03711331.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1198–1208.
    1. Ibn Saied W, Mourvillier B, Cohen Y, et al. A comparison of the mortality risk associated with ventilator-acquired bacterial pneumonia and nonventilator ICU-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Crit Care Med 2019; 47:345–352.
    1. Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia: an official clinical practice guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200:e45–e67.
    1. Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M, et al. Management of adults with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63:e61–e111.
    1. Loubet P, Voiriot G, Houhou-Fidouh N, et al. Impact of respiratory viruses in hospital-acquired pneumonia in the intensive care unit: a single-center retrospective study. J Clin Virol 2017; 91:52–57.

MeSH terms

Associated data