Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 31;18(1):256.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010256.

Uncovering the Role of Different Instructional Designs When Learning Tactical Scenes of Play through Dynamic Visualizations: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Uncovering the Role of Different Instructional Designs When Learning Tactical Scenes of Play through Dynamic Visualizations: A Systematic Review

Ghazi Rekik et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Dynamic visualizations such as videos or animations have been developed to exchange information that transforms over time across a broad range of professional/academic contexts. However, such visual tools may impose substantial demands on the learner's cognitive resources that are very limited in current knowledge. Cognitive load theory has been used to improve learning from dynamic visualizations by providing different instructional designs to manage learner cognitive load. This paper reviews a series of experimental studies assessing the effects of certain instructional designs on learning of tactical scenes of play through dynamic visualizations. An electronic database search was performed on the Web of Science and PubMed/Medline databases from inception to July 2020 using a combination of relevant keywords. Manual searches were also made. The search was limited to English language. A total of 515 records were screened by two researchers using the Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome(s) (PICO) criteria. The quality and validity of the included studies were assessed using "QualSyst". Learning indicators in students and/or players (male and female) at any age category and competitive level were considered. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria for this review, which focused on the effects of four instructional designs (i.e., using static visualizations, employing sequential presentation, applying segmentation, and decreasing presentation speed) on learning various game systems through dynamic visualizations. These studies indicate that (i) the effectiveness of all instructional designs depend upon the level of learners' expertise when learning soccer/Australian football scenes through animations/videos, (ii) the effectiveness of using static visualizations instead of animations/videos showing soccer/basketball scenes depend upon the type of the depicted knowledge (i.e., motor knowledge or descriptive knowledge) for novice learners, (iii) the effectiveness of employing static visualizations and decreasing presentation speed when learning soccer/basketball scenes from animations/videos depend upon the level of content complexity, for novice learners. The current review demonstrated important practical implications for both coaches and physical education teachers using either animations and/or videos to communicate game systems. Indeed, findings suggested that adapting instructional designs to the level of learners' expertise, type of depicted knowledge, and level of content complexity is a crucial part of effective tactical learning from dynamic visualizations.

Keywords: cognitive load theory; dynamic visualizations; instructional designs; learning; team sports.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were reported for this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart illustrating the different phases of the search and study selection. A total of 11 articles fulfilled the eligibility criteria.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The distribution (by year and number) of studies focused on the role of instructional designs when learning tactical scenes of play through dynamic visualizations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schnotz W., Lowe R.K. A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In: Lowe R.K., Schnotz W., editors. Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press; New York, NY, USA: 2008. pp. 304–356.
    1. Rekik G., Khacharem A., Belkhir Y., Bali N., Jarraya M. The instructional benefits of dynamic visualizations in the acquisition of basketball tactical actions. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 2019;35:74–81. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12312. - DOI
    1. Kriz S., Hegarty M. Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2007;65:911–930. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.06.005. - DOI
    1. Kühl T., Scheiter K., Gerjets P., Edelmann J. The influence of text modality on learning with static and dynamic visualizations. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2011;27:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.008. - DOI
    1. Garland T.B., Sanchez C.A. Rotational perspective and learning procedural tasks from dynamic media. Comput. Educ. 2013;69:31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.014. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources