Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 4;22(1):7.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01358-9.

Home blood-pressure measurement for the diagnosis and monitoring of arterial hypertension by French general practitioners: a cross-sectional survey in the Auvergne region

Mangiavillano Xavier  1 , Tréfond Jéromine  1   2 , Plaquevent-Hostache Guillaume  3 , Tanguy Gilles  1   2 , Bœuf-Gibot Sylvaine  1   2 , Mulliez Aurélien  4 , Vorilhon Philippe  5   6   7
Affiliations

Home blood-pressure measurement for the diagnosis and monitoring of arterial hypertension by French general practitioners: a cross-sectional survey in the Auvergne region

Mangiavillano Xavier et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Home blood-pressure measurement (HBPM) is recommended for the diagnosis of hypertension and monitoring of patients with hypertension. Since 2013, the French National Health Insurance Body (FNHIB) has promoted HBPM to general practitioners (GPs). The objective of the study was to evaluate the practice of HBPM by French GPs to diagnose and monitor hypertension, 3 years after the beginning of the FNHIB campaign.

Methods: We conducted a postal survey from 7 March to 31 May 2016. All of the 1040 GPs practising in the Auvergne region in France were invited to participate, using a self-reporting questionnaire. We obtained information on the characteristics of the GPs, and their practice regarding the use of HBPM. Use of HBPM was reported as "never, occasionally, regularly and systematically". Frequency of HBMP use was analysed using multivariate ordered logistic regression model.

Results: A total of 569 (54.7%) GPs responded to the survey. They were 50.3 (± 11.5) years old, 241 (43.0%) were female, and 352 (62.7%) worked in urban areas. Among them, 530 (94.5%) reported the use of HBPM for diagnosis and 519 (92.5%) for monitoring hypertension. To diagnose hypertension, younger GPs (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95-0.98), GPs practising in a group (OR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.00-2.10) and in an MHC (OR = 2.09; 95% CI: 1.15-3.78), as compared to GPs with individual practices, and Clinical Tutors, as compared to non-Clinical Tutors, (OR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.33-2.79) reported more frequent use of HBPM. To manage hypertension, female GPs, as compared to male GPs, (OR=1.47; 95% CI: 1.04-2.06), younger GPs (OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97-0.99), and Clinical Tutors (OR = 1.90; 95% CI: 1.31-2.75) reported more frequent use of HBPM.

Conclusions: Our survey reveals that 3 years after the introduction of the FNHIB incentives, the use of HBPM by participating GPs to diagnose and manage hypertension is well established. A larger survey of GPs from other regions would make it possible to verify whether our results can be extrapolated to France as a whole.

Keywords: Arterial hypertension; Blood pressure; Cross-sectional survey; General practitioners; Guidelines; Home blood pressure measurement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of GPs. Legend GPs: General Practitioners
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2018;36:1953–2041. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001940. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tucker KL, Sheppard JP, Stevens R, Bosworth HB, Bove A, Bray EP, et al. Self-monitoring of blood pressure in hypertension: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2017;14:e1002389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002389. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blacher J, Halimi J-M, Hanon O, Mourad J-J, Pathak A, Schnebert B, et al. Prise en charge de l’hypertension artérielle de l’adulte. Recommandations 2013 de la Société française d’hypertension artérielle. Ann Cardiol Angeiol. 2013;62:132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2013.04.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71:1269–1324. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manto A, Dzudie A, Halle MP, Aminde LN, Abanda MH, Ashuntantang G, et al. Agreement between home and ambulatory blood pressure measurement in non-dialysed chronic kidney disease patients in Cameroon. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;29. 10.11604/pamj.2018.29.71.12078. - PMC - PubMed