Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 4;22(1):5.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03923-w.

In vitro elution characteristics of gentamicin-impregnated Polymethylmethacrylate: premixed with a second powder vs. liquid Lyophilization

Affiliations

In vitro elution characteristics of gentamicin-impregnated Polymethylmethacrylate: premixed with a second powder vs. liquid Lyophilization

Wongthawat Liawrungrueang et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement, or antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), were developed to prevent and treat bone and joint infections. Gentamicin is an antibiotic that is commonly used in combination with PMMA; however, gentamicin powder is hard to obtain in many countries. This study aimed to evaluate the elution characteristics of gentamicin-impregnated PMMA made with lyophilized liquid gentamicin, compared with PMMA; which is made from commercial gentamicin powder.

Methods: The experimental sample was divided into 2 groups: the gentamicin power group (PG-PMMA) and the lyophilized liquid gentamicin group (LG-PMMA). Ten cement spacers were prepared in each group. These were produced by mixing gentamicin powder, or lyophilized liquid gentamicin, with a powder polymer before adding the liquid monomer (2 g of gentamicin and 40 g of PMMA). The volume and surface area of the antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers were 50 cm3 and 110 cm2, respectively. Each spacer was immersed in phosphate-buffered saline, which was changed daily under sterile conditions. The solutions were collected to measure the level of gentamicin using the enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT), at days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42.

Results: The collections from both groups had high concentrations of gentamicin on day 1 (113.63 ± 23.42 mg/dL in LG-PMMA and 61.7 ±8.37 mg/dL in PG-PMMA), but experienced a continuous decrease over time. The PMMA spacers from both groups could release gentamicin for up to 6 weeks (3.28 ± 1.17 mg/dL in LG-PMMA and 1.21 ± 0.28 mg/dL in PG-PMMA). However, there were significantly higher levels of gentamicin concentrations in the LG-PMMA group compared to the PG-PMMA group at all time points (P< 0.05).

Conclusion: Gentamicin-impregnated PMMA made with lyophilized liquid gentamicin had approximately a two times higher rate of antibiotic elution in preliminary in vitro studies, as compared with PMMA made with premixed gentamicin powder.

Keywords: Antibiotic spacer; Elution characteristics; Liquid gentamicin; Lyophilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Forty grams of methylmethacrylate polymer (Palacos® R bone cement; Heraeus Kulzer GmbH, Wehrheim, Germany) mixed with 2 g of gentamicin powder (1a); 50 ml-syringe filled with the polymer-gentamicin mixture in the dough stage to create the uniformed, cylinder shapes of the cement spacers (1b); PG-PMMA spacer group (1c) and LG-PMMA spacer group (1d)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Concentration of eluted gentamicin in LG-PMMA and PG-PMMA groups during the 6-week study period
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Scanning electron microscope images of the surface of PMMA spacers (3a) LG-PMMA spacer; (3b) PG-PMMA spacer. The picture of the LG-PMMA spacer showed greater density of small uniformed, rounded shape pores; while the PG-PMMA spacer had a smoother surface area
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Disk diffusion method for antibiotic susceptibility testing; (4a) Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, (4b) Escherichia coli ATCC 25922

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kavanagh N, Ryan EJ, Widaa A, Sexton G, Fennell J, O’Rourke S, et al. Staphylococcal osteomyelitis: disease progression, treatment challenges, and future directions. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31(2):e00084–e00017. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00084-17. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bistolfi A, Massazza G, Verné E, Massè A, Deledda D, Ferraris S, et al. Antibiotic-loaded cement in orthopedic surgery: a review. ISRN Orthop. 2011;2011:290851. doi: 10.5402/2011/290851. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buchholz HW, Engelbrecht H. Depot effects of various antibiotics mixed with Palacos resins. Chir Z Alle Geb Oper Medizen. 1970;41(11):511–515. - PubMed
    1. Springer BD, Lee G-C, Osmon D, Haidukewych GJ, Hanssen AD, Jacofsky DJ. Systemic safety of high-dose antibiotic-loaded cement spacers after resection of an infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2004;427:47–51. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000144476.43661.10. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neut D, Kluin OS, Thompson J, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Gentamicin release from commercially-available gentamicin-loaded PMMA bone cements in a prosthesis-related interfacial gap model and their antibacterial efficacy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:258. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-258. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources