Research training program in a Turkish medical school: challenges, barriers and opportunities from the perspectives of the students and faculty members
- PMID: 33397360
- PMCID: PMC7780673
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02454-1
Research training program in a Turkish medical school: challenges, barriers and opportunities from the perspectives of the students and faculty members
Abstract
Background: Providing medical students with opportunities for research experience is challenging for medical schools in developing countries. The Research Training Program (RTP), which is carried out in Ege University Faculty of Medicine (EUFM) parallel to the core curriculum, aims to improve the scientific competencies of the highly motivated students and to provide them with the opportunity to conduct a research. The purpose of this project is to evaluate RTP through the perspectives of students and faculty members.
Methods: This phenomenological study included two groups; students of RTP and faculty members who contributed to the program. Interviews were conducted with the research group whose selection was determined by maximum variation technique. Interviews with new individuals continued until data saturation was reached. Interpretative data analysis started with close reading of the transcripts and generating a list of codes. Coding by two independently, developing categories and themes were the following steps.
Results: Twenty-one RTP students and 14 faculty members were interviewed. The main motivation for students to participate was the desire to learn how to do research. The introduction course providing the students with the basic competencies needs to be improved in terms of practical activities. It was reported that during the project process students needed intensive guidance especially in finding a research topic and a mentor. The students' lack of time, deficit of enough mentoring and the fact that conducting a research does not provide a competitive advantage for residency are important obstacles to the completion of the program. The most frequently mentioned achievement of the students is to learn all the stages of the research as well as getting acquainted with critical thinking.
Conclusions: This research showed that it was realistic to implement research programs for highly motivated students in medical schools with conditions like those in EUFM. The solution of mentor shortage emerged in this study is dependent on the adoption of student research as a national policy. Getting acquainted with the interrogative thinking style, conducting research, and making lifelong learning a core value are more important outcomes of research programs than the number of completed projects.
Keywords: Medical student; Research; Science education, undergraduate research; Scientific competencies.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors of this article declare that they do not have any competing interests except that they are either former or ongoing members of the commission managing the Research Training Program.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Leadership Opportunities with Communities, the Medically Underserved, and Special Populations (LOCUS).Acad Med. 2002 Jul;77(7):740. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200207000-00026. Acad Med. 2002. PMID: 12114159
-
The importance of scientific competencies in German medical curricula - the student perspective.BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1257-4. BMC Med Educ. 2018. PMID: 29921261 Free PMC article.
-
The medical students' perspective of faculty and informal mentors: a questionnaire study.BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 8;16:4. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0526-3. BMC Med Educ. 2016. PMID: 26746690 Free PMC article.
-
Mentoring program design and implementation in new medical schools.Med Educ Online. 2014 Jun 23;19:24570. doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.24570. eCollection 2014. Med Educ Online. 2014. PMID: 24962112 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Senior mentor program: a geriatrics focused curriculum.Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):934-5. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00039. Acad Med. 2002. PMID: 12228106 Review.
Cited by
-
A commentary on "6th year medical students' future specialty preferences: A cross-sectional study".Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jul 26;68:102612. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102612. eCollection 2021 Aug. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021. PMID: 34434550 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Portuguese Medical Students' Interest for Science and Research Declines after Freshman Year.Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 12;9(10):1357. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101357. Healthcare (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34683037 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of online expert interview-based research training on medical trainees' knowledge and confidence: a mixed-methods design.Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 22;17(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00764-5. Int J Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 39578740 Free PMC article.
-
Practical guide for the use of medical evidence in scientific publication: Recommendations for the medical student: Narrative review.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Oct 9;71:102932. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102932. eCollection 2021 Nov. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021. PMID: 34659747 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Integrating Research and Teaching in Medical Education: Challenges, Strategies, and Implications for Healthcare.J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2024 Jan 1;12(1):1-7. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2023.99751.1854. eCollection 2024 Jan. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2024. PMID: 38313425 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- General Medical Council . Tomorrow’s doctors. 2009.
-
- World Federation for Medical Education . Basic Medical Education: WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement. 2015.
-
- Seymour E, Hunter AB, Laursen SL, DeAntoni T. Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: first findings from a three-year study. Sci Educ. 2004;88(4):493–534. doi: 10.1002/sce.10131. - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources