Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 4;7(1):5.
doi: 10.1186/s40813-020-00181-z.

Biosecurity in pig farms: a review

Laura Valeria Alarcón  1 , Alberto Allepuz  2   3 , Enric Mateu  2   3
Affiliations
Review

Biosecurity in pig farms: a review

Laura Valeria Alarcón et al. Porcine Health Manag. .

Erratum in

  • Correction to: Biosecurity in pig farms: a review.
    Alarcón LV, Allepuz A, Mateu E. Alarcón LV, et al. Porcine Health Manag. 2021 Mar 5;7(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40813-021-00202-5. Porcine Health Manag. 2021. PMID: 33673866 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

The perception of the importance of animal health and its relationship with biosecurity has increased in recent years with the emergence and re-emergence of several diseases difficult to control. This is particularly evident in the case of pig farming as shown by the recent episodes of African swine fever or porcine epidemic diarrhoea. Moreover, a better biosecurity may help to improve productivity and may contribute to reducing the use of antibiotics. Biosecurity can be defined as the application of measures aimed to reduce the probability of the introduction (external biosecurity) and further spread of pathogens within the farm (internal biosecurity). Thus, the key idea is to avoid transmission, either between farms or within the farm. This implies knowledge of the epidemiology of the diseases to be avoided that is not always available, but since ways of transmission of pathogens are limited to a few, it is possible to implement effective actions even with some gaps in our knowledge on a given disease. For the effective design of a biosecurity program, veterinarians must know how diseases are transmitted, the risks and their importance, which mitigation measures are thought to be more effective and how to evaluate the biosecurity and its improvements. This review provides a source of information on external and internal biosecurity measures that reduce risks in swine production and the relationship between these measures and the epidemiology of the main diseases, as well as a description of some systems available for risk analysis and the assessment of biosecurity. Also, it reviews the factors affecting the successful application of a biosecurity plan in a pig farm.

Keywords: Biosecurity; Disease prevention; Epidemiology; Mitigation measures; Pig farming.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors of this manuscript has personal or financial relationship with people or organizations that could influence or bias the work present in this paper.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Alexander TJL. Methods of disease control. In: Leman AD, Straw BE, Glock RD, Mengeling WL, Penny RHC and Scholl 1986, Editors. Diseases of Swine. 6th edition. Ames, Iowa. p 778-802.
    1. Muirhead MR. Herd biosecurity. In: International Pig Letter Symposium. Quebec; 1991. p. 41–4.
    1. Moore C. Biosecurity and minimal disease herds. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1992;8:461–474. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30698-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amass SF, Kirk Clark L. Biosecurity considerations for pork production units. J Swine Health Prod. 1999;7:217–228.
    1. Barceló J, Marco E. On-Farm biosecurity. In: Proceedings of the 15th IPVS Congress. Birmingham, England. Editors: M A Varley; Stanley Done; Jill Thomson and International Pig Veterinary Society. Editoral: Scientific Committee of the 15th IPVS Congress; 1988. p. 129–33.

LinkOut - more resources