Guideline of the guidelines: urolithiasis
- PMID: 33399368
- DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000855
Guideline of the guidelines: urolithiasis
Abstract
Purpose of review: We reviewed the latest guidelines on urolithiasis to highlight the commonalities and differences in the most important recommendations.
Recent findings: Most guidelines utilize systematic review of literature and grade evidence to generate the appropriate recommendations and statements. Only the latest versions of guidelines were included in this review.
Summary: Four national and international guidelines were included in this review, including those of the EAU (European Association of Urology), the AUA (American Urological Association)/ES (Endourological Society), the UAA (Urological Association of Asia) and the NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) guidelines. There are general similarities in the most important recommendations. The EAU guidelines provide the latest evidence updates.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR. Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int 2005; 68:1808–1814.
-
- Trinchieri A. Epidemiology of urolithiasis: an update. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2008; 5:101–106.
-
- Faraday M, Hubbard H, Kosiak B, Dmochowski R. Staying at the cutting edge: a review and analysis of evidence reporting and grading; the recommendations of the American Urological Association. BJU Int 2009; 104:294–297.
-
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336:924–926.
-
- NICE Guideline - Renal and ureteric stones: assessment and management. BJU Int 2019; 123:220–232.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials