Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;298(3):505-516.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202553. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

The Biological Meaning of Radiomic Features

Affiliations
Review

The Biological Meaning of Radiomic Features

Michal R Tomaszewski et al. Radiology. 2021 Mar.

Erratum in

  • The Biological Meaning of Radiomic Features.
    Tomaszewski MR, Gillies RJ. Tomaszewski MR, et al. Radiology. 2021 May;299(2):E256. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021219005. Radiology. 2021. PMID: 33900879 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

An earlier incorrect version appeared online. This article was corrected on February 10, 2021.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Image shows how multiscale quantification provides complementary tumor insight. Histologic and genomic analysis can provide specific small-scale insight useful for validation of radiomic results, focused on quantification of spatial patterns of size exceeding image resolution.
Figure 1:
Image shows how multiscale quantification provides complementary tumor insight. Histologic and genomic analysis can provide specific small-scale insight useful for validation of radiomic results, focused on quantification of spatial patterns of size exceeding image resolution.
Radiomics can quantify visual tumor characteristics. CT images (left) of lung cancer lesions from two patients (A and B) were used by Tunali et al to calculate radial gradient maps (right) that describe tumor edge interface (tumor outlined in black dotted line). Quantification of simple mean and standard deviation of map in peritumoral region is associated with survival and correlates to qualitative semantic descriptors of tumor edge, such as border definition. Source.—Reference 14.
Figure 2:
Radiomics can quantify visual tumor characteristics. CT images (left) of lung cancer lesions from two patients (A and B) were used by Tunali et al to calculate radial gradient maps (right) that describe tumor edge interface (tumor outlined in black dotted line). Quantification of simple mean and standard deviation of map in peritumoral region is associated with survival and correlates to qualitative semantic descriptors of tumor edge, such as border definition. Source.—Reference .
Associations between radiomic and pathway data can be explored histologically. A, Diagram depicts analysis of correlations between pathway enrichment and radiomic features presented by Grossman et al. Multiple clusters (numbers 1–13) describe relationships between distinct biological processes and image information. Further correlation of relevant radiomic features and immunohistochemical staining (nuclear CD3 expression) was performed to validate findings and to provide link to understand interaction between genetics and imaging characteristics of tumor. B, Example tumors with strong immune response and/or high radiomic score (left) and low immune response and/or radiomic score (right) are shown. Source.—Reference 43.
Figure 3:
Associations between radiomic and pathway data can be explored histologically. A, Diagram depicts analysis of correlations between pathway enrichment and radiomic features presented by Grossman et al. Multiple clusters (numbers 1–13) describe relationships between distinct biological processes and image information. Further correlation of relevant radiomic features and immunohistochemical staining (nuclear CD3 expression) was performed to validate findings and to provide link to understand interaction between genetics and imaging characteristics of tumor. B, Example tumors with strong immune response and/or high radiomic score (left) and low immune response and/or radiomic score (right) are shown. Source.—Reference .
Coregistered histologic findings provide biological insight into image features. H&E = hematoxylin-eosin. A, McGarry et al (additional data provided by authors) developed model using multiparametric MRI information (left), trained on coregistered annotated hematoxylin-eosin–stained slides (middle) to model prostate epithelium density (right), relevant for tumor staging. B, Jardim-Perassi used multiparametric MRI (left), coregistered with histologic maps of viability, proliferation, and hypoxia (middle) to understand biological meaning of imaging habitats (right). DCE = dynamic contrast enhanced, DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging, Pimo = pimonidazole. C, Tomaszewski et al proposed T2-weighted MRI (left) histogram biomarker of radiation therapy response and used coregistered histologically derived nuclear density maps (middle) to demonstrate source of observed imaging changes through similarities in histogram features (right). Source.—References 79, 80, 89.
Figure 4:
Coregistered histologic findings provide biological insight into image features. H&E = hematoxylin-eosin. A, McGarry et al (additional data provided by authors) developed model using multiparametric MRI information (left), trained on coregistered annotated hematoxylin-eosin–stained slides (middle) to model prostate epithelium density (right), relevant for tumor staging. B, Jardim-Perassi used multiparametric MRI (left), coregistered with histologic maps of viability, proliferation, and hypoxia (middle) to understand biological meaning of imaging habitats (right). DCE = dynamic contrast enhanced, DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging, Pimo = pimonidazole. C, Tomaszewski et al proposed T2-weighted MRI (left) histogram biomarker of radiation therapy response and used coregistered histologically derived nuclear density maps (middle) to demonstrate source of observed imaging changes through similarities in histogram features (right). Source.—References , , .

References

    1. Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer 2012;48(4):441–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Altman DG, et al. STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open 2016;6(11):e012799. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, et al. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017;14(12):749–762. - PubMed
    1. Zwanenburg A, Leger S, Vallières M, Löck S. The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping. Radiology 2020;295(2):328–338. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology 2016;278(2):563–577. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources