Outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease in Veteran patients
- PMID: 33400103
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01183-3
Outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease in Veteran patients
Abstract
The robotic platform for cholecystectomy has been extensively studied in comparison to its laparoscopic counterpart with acceptable outcomes. However, wide acceptance of a robotic approach to cholecystectomy has been limited by increased operative room (OR) times and substantially higher cost. This is a single-institution retrospective review of Veteran patients presenting for elective laparoscopic (LC) and robotic (RC) cholecystectomies for benign biliary disease at the Dallas VA Medical Center. The primary goal was to interrogate 30-day morbidity as well as operative room times, estimated blood loss (EBL), hospital length of stay (LOS), and conversion rates. The entire cohort included 612 patients (age = 55.1 ± 12.9 years, men = 77.9%, BMI = 31.2 ± 6.3 kg/m2) undergoing elective cholecystectomy (LC = 441 and RC = 171) for benign biliary disease (biliary colic = 78.8%, history of biliary pancreatitis = 7.8%, history of cholecystitis = 5.7%). Univariate analysis comparing LC and RC showed the two groups to be of similar age (55.4 ± 12.4 vs. 54.4 ± 14.2 years; p = 0.4), male gender (79.4% vs. 74.3%, p = 0.2), and BMI (31.1 ± 6.4 vs. 31.5 ± 6.3 kg/m2; p = 0.5). Except for dyslipidemia (LC = 48.3% vs. RC = 36.8%; p = 0.01), both groups had the same rate of co-morbid conditions. ASA level III and IV (LC = 60.1 vs. RC = 69.0%, p = 0.04) was higher in the RC group. Both groups underwent surgical intervention for similar indications (biliary colic LC = 80.5% vs. RC = 74.3; p = 0.1). Hospital LOS (1.7 ± 3.2 vs. 0.3 ± 0.9 days, p < 0.001), EBL (32.3 ± 52.3 vs. 17.0 ± 43.1; p = 0.001), and conversion to open (6.6% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.001) were all superior with the robotic platform. Thirty-day overall morbidity (9.8% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.4), skin-to-skin OR time (84.5 ± 33.5 vs. 88.0 ± 35.3 min, p = 0.2), and total OR time (129.2 ± 36.8 vs. 129.7 ± 39.7, p = 0.9) were similar between the LC and RC groups. Despite being older and having more comorbidities, Veteran patients undergoing robotic cholecystectomy experienced equivalent OR time and a moderate improvement in conversion rate, EBL, and hospital LOS compared to those undergoing conventional laparoscopy, therein demonstrating the safety and efficacy of the robotic platform for this patient population.
Keywords: Acute cholecystitis; Biliary colic; Biliary dyskinesia; Biliary pancreatitis; Choledocholithiasis; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Robotic cholecystectomy.
© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Similar articles
-
A retrospective comparison of robotic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative outcomes and cost analysis.Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1436-1441. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5134-0. Epub 2016 Aug 5. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27495346
-
Comparative analysis of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pediatric patients.J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Oct;56(10):1876-1880. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.11.013. Epub 2020 Nov 20. J Pediatr Surg. 2021. PMID: 33276970
-
Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Int J Surg. 2014 Oct;12(10):1077-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.405. Epub 2014 Sep 9. Int J Surg. 2014. PMID: 25218366
-
Feasibility of robotic cholecystectomy at an academic center with a young robotic surgery program: a retrospective cohort study with umbrella review.J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 27;18(1):93. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01824-x. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38411776 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4377-4392. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6295-9. Epub 2018 Jun 28. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29956028
Cited by
-
Systematic review: robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic multiport cholecystectomy.J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):1967-1977. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01662-3. Epub 2023 Jul 13. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 37439902
-
Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review.J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):275-290. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01425-6. Epub 2022 Jun 21. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 35727485 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Efficacy and Postoperative Intervention.JSLS. 2025 Jan-Mar;29(1):e2024.00058. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00058. Epub 2024 Mar 27. JSLS. 2025. PMID: 40151771 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of minimally invasive cholecystectomy: a narrative review.BMC Surg. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02659-x. BMC Surg. 2024. PMID: 39609785 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Aetiology, diagnosis and management for ischaemic cholecystitis: current perspectives.eGastroenterology. 2023 Nov 24;1(2):e100004. doi: 10.1136/egastro-2023-100004. eCollection 2023 Sep. eGastroenterology. 2023. PMID: 39943995 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Halldestam I et al (2004) Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones. Br J Surg 91(6):734–738 - PubMed
-
- Everhart JE et al (1999) Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology 117(3):632–639 - PubMed
-
- Shaffer EA (2006) Gallstone disease: epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20(6):981–996 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical