Passive immunization and its rebirth in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic
- PMID: 33400975
- PMCID: PMC7834679
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106275
Passive immunization and its rebirth in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to a rapid search for therapeutic and preventive measures because of the potentially severe course of infection. The antiviral drug, remdesivir, and the anti-inflammatory agent, dexamethasone, have shown beneficial effects. As the current COVID-19 vaccines are not yet fully available to everyone, or they may not be readily and universally accepted, various treatment options are being evaluated and will still be needed under these conditions. One of these treatment options, passive immunization, has shown promise in some studies. Further research is needed to determine the utility of immunotherapy with convalescent plasma or artificially produced monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of symptomatic patients, and potentially for use as post-exposure prophylaxis, at least until more effective drugs are available or safe and effective vaccines are distributed and administered to everyone.
Keywords: COVID-19; Convalescent plasma; Immune globulin; Monoclonal antibodies; Passive immunization; SARS-CoV-2.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
References
-
- Dolman CE. Landmarks and pioneers in the control of diphtheria. Can J Public Health. 1973;64:317–336. - PubMed
-
- The College of Physicians of Philadelphia. Passive Immunization — History of Vaccines. www.historyofvaccines.org. Retrieved on 07-28-2020.
-
- Report Report of the Lancet Special Commission on the relative strengths of diphtheria antitoxic serums. Lancet. 1986;148:182–195. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)72399-9. PMC 5050965. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous