Postoperative Home Monitoring After Joint Replacement: Retrospective Outcome Study Comparing Cases With Matched Historical Controls
- PMID: 33401365
- PMCID: PMC7728407
- DOI: 10.2196/10169
Postoperative Home Monitoring After Joint Replacement: Retrospective Outcome Study Comparing Cases With Matched Historical Controls
Abstract
Background: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients undergoing postoperative home monitoring (POHM) following elective primary hip or knee replacements.
Objective: The objectives of our study were to compare the cost per patient, readmissions rate, emergency room visits, and mortality within 30 days to the historical standard of care using descriptive analysis.
Methods: After Research Ethics Board approval, patients who were enrolled and had completed a POHM study were individually matched to historical controls by age, American Society of Anesthesiology class, and procedure at a ratio 1:2.
Results: A total of 54 patients in the study group and 107 in the control group were eligible for the analysis. Compared with the historical standard of care, the average cost per case was Can $5826.32 (SD 1418.89) in the POHM group and Can $9198.58 (SD 1513.59) for controls. After 30 days, there were 2 emergency room visits (3.7%) and 0 readmissions in the POHM group, whereas there were 8 emergency room visits (7.5%) and 2 readmissions (1.9%) in the control group. No mortalities occurred in either group.
Conclusions: The POHM study offers an early hospital discharge pathway for elective hip and knee procedures at a 38% reduction of the standard of care cost. The multidisciplinary transitional POHM team may provide a reliable forum to minimize readmissions, and emergency room visits within 30 days postoperatively.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02143232; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02143232 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/73WQ9QR6P).
Keywords: continuity of care; cost reductions; length of stay; postoperative care; postoperative emergency department visit; postoperative home monitoring; postoperative readmissions.
©Homer Yang, Geoff Dervin, Susan Madden, Ashraf Fayad, Paul Beaulé, Sylvain Gagné, Mary Lou Crossan, Kathryn Wheeler, Melody Afagh, Tinghua Zhang, Monica Taljaard. Originally published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine (http://periop.jmir.org), 05.11.2018.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
References
-
- https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/Readmission_to_acutecare_en.pdf. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2012. All-Cause Readmission to Acute Care and Return to the Emergency Department.
-
- Luu P, Hussain T, Chang H, Pfoh E, Pollack C. The role of continuity in hospital care for readmitted colon cancer patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;2015(30):S75.
-
- Brooke BS, Goodney PP, Kraiss LW, Gottlieb DJ, Samore MH, Finlayson SRG. Readmission destination and risk of mortality after major surgery: an observational cohort study. Lancet. 2015 Aug 29;386(9996):884–95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60087-3. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26093917 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical