Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 5;20(1):2.
doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-00839-3.

3-Dimensional printing in rehabilitation: feasibility of printing an upper extremity gross motor function assessment tool

Naaz Kapadia  1   2   3 , Mathew Myers  4   5 , Kristin Musselman  6   7 , Rosalie H Wang  8   9   10 , Aaron Yurkewich  11 , Milos R Popovic  4   5
Affiliations

3-Dimensional printing in rehabilitation: feasibility of printing an upper extremity gross motor function assessment tool

Naaz Kapadia et al. Biomed Eng Online. .

Abstract

Background: Use of standardized and scientifically sound outcome measures is encouraged in clinical practice and research. With the development of newer rehabilitation therapies, we need technology-supported upper extremity outcome measures that are easily accessible, reliable and valid. 3-Dimensional printing (3D-printing) has recently seen a meteoric rise in interest within medicine including the field of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of designing and constructing a 3D printed version of the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-Hand Function Test (TRI-HFT). The TRI-HFT is an upper extremity gross motor function assessment tool that measures function at the intersection of the International Classification of Function's body structure and function, and activity domain. The secondary objective was to assess the preliminary psychometrics of this test in individuals with stroke.

Results: 3D design files were created using the measurements of the original TRI-HFT objects. The 3D printed objects were then compared to the original test objects to ensure that the original dimensions were preserved. All objects were successfully printed except the sponge and paper which required some modification. The error margin for weight of the objects was within 10% of the original TRI-HFT for the rest of the objects. Nine participants underwent the following assessments: the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI), Fugl Meyer Assessment-Hand (FMA-Hand), Chedoke McMaster stages of recovery of the arm (CMSA-Arm) and Chedoke McMaster stages of recovery of the hand (CMSA-Hand) and the 3D TRI-HFT for assessment of psychometric properties of the test. The video recorded assessment of the 3D TRI-HFT was used for reliability testing. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the scores on 3D TRI-HFT with the scores on CAHAI, CMSA-Arm, CMSA-Hand and FMA-Hand. The 3D TRI-HFT had high inter-rater reliability (Intra-Class Correlation Co-efficient (ICC) of 0.99; P < 0.000), high intra-rater reliability (ICC of 0.99; P < 0.000) and moderate-to-strong correlation with the CMSA-Arm, CMSA-Hand and FMA-Hand scores.

Conclusions: The TRI-HFT could be successfully 3D printed and initial testing indicates that the test is a reliable and valid measure of upper extremity motor function in individuals with stroke.

Keywords: 3D printing; Assessment; Outcome measure; Psychometric properties; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Upper extremity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Milos R. Popovic is the Chief Technology Officer and Director of Myndtec, Inc. a company that manufactures transcutaneous functional electrical stimulators.

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1:
3D printed Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-Hand Function Test (3D TRI-HFT)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Scoring at two different time points by the same assessor (i.e. rating 1 and rating 2) and b scoring by three different assessors at a single time point
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Otterman N, Veerbeek J, Schiemanck S, van der Wees P, Nollet F, Kwakkel G. Selecting relevant and feasible measurement instruments for the revised Dutch clinical practice guideline for physical therapy in patients after stroke. DisabilRehabil. 2017;39(14):1449–1457. - PubMed
    1. Sullivan JE, Crowner BE, Kluding PM, Nichols D, Rose DK, Yoshida R, et al. Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: process and recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association neurology section task force. PhysTher. 2013;93(10):1383–1396. - PubMed
    1. Alt Murphy M, Resteghini C, Feys P, Lamers I. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:29. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0292-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31. - PubMed
    1. Chen HF, Lin KC, Wu CY, Chen CL. Rasch validation and predictive validity of the action research arm test in patients receiving stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(6):1039–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.033. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources