The last survivor of unitary and two-piece inflatables-the Ambicor. Does it still have a role in today's implant marketplace?
- PMID: 33402721
- DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-00367-7
The last survivor of unitary and two-piece inflatables-the Ambicor. Does it still have a role in today's implant marketplace?
Abstract
The history of the development of today's very dependable three-piece inflatable penile prostheses is fascinating. In its infancy, the three piece was plagued with frequent revisions and a relatively complex insertion and consequently unitary and two-piece prostheses flourished with the implanting urologists. While the surgery was less difficult because these devices did not require the dreaded reservoir insertion, they often proved unsatisfactory to patients in flaccidity, erection and longevity. By the turn of this century all of the unitary and two-piece inflatables had been withdrawn from the market except the Ambicor two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. This paper covers the history of the various unitary and 2-piece inflatable models before examining a critical question: is the Ambicor 2-piece still a needed implant today?
© 2020. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
References
-
- Kabalin JN, Kessler R. Experience with the Hydroflex penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1989;41:58–60. - DOI
-
- Anafarta K, Yaman O, Aydos K. Clinical experience with the Dynaflex penile prosthesis in 120 patients. Urology. 1998;52:1098–2. - DOI
-
- Oberlin DT, Matuewicz RS, Bachrach L, Hofer MD, Brannigan RE, Flurry SC. National practice patterns of treatment of erectile dysfunction with penile prosthesis implantation. J Urol. 2015;193:2040–4. - DOI
-
- Stanisic TH, Dean JC, Donovan JM, Beutler LE. Clinical experience with a self-contained penile implant: the Flexiflate. J Urol. 1988;139:947–50. - DOI
-
- Fein RL. The GFS Mark II inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1992;147:66–9. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical