Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar;20(1):227-237.
doi: 10.4314/ahs.v20i1.28.

A review of the safety of vaccines used in routine immunization in Africa

Affiliations
Review

A review of the safety of vaccines used in routine immunization in Africa

Peter Yamoah et al. Afr Health Sci. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Despite the significant role played by vaccines in global health, concerns over vaccine safety have increased tremendously over the years. There have been occasions where vaccines have caused rare, adverse reactions some of which have led to hospitalizations and even death. It is therefore important to establish the safety profile of routinely used vaccines in order to allay fears pertaining to their use.

Objectives: This review was aimed at pooling together the safety data of selected vaccines used for routine immunization in Africa, a region of the world with paucity of vaccine safety data.

Methods: Adverse Events Following Immunization safety data was searched for rotavirus, yellow fever, measles, rubella, tuberculosis (Bacillus Calmette Guerin-BCG), pneumococcal, Haemophilus Influenza type b, polio, meningococcal and the influenza A (H1N1) vaccines in PUBMED, Google Scholar, Clinical trials.gov and Cochrane controlled register of trials databases.

Results: A total of twenty-four serious AEFIs and twenty-three minor AEFIs were identified from the review. The strength of association between AEFIs and vaccine was high for tuberculosis vaccine and moderate for all other vaccines.

Conclusion: Even though AEFIs (including mild and severe) were identified in the review, all the vaccines studied were generally well tolerated.

Keywords: Africa; Safety of vaccines; immunization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
PRISMA diagram for the review

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Greenwood B. The contribution of vaccination to global health: past, present and future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2014;369(1645) doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0433. 20130433 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roeder P, Mariner J, Kock R. Rinderpest: the veterinary perspective on eradication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2013;368 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0139. 20120139. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weiss RA, Esparza J. The prevention and eradication of smallpox: a commentary on Sloane (1755) “An account of inoculation”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015;370(1666) doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0378. 20140378 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Youde J. Cattle scourge no more. The eradication of rinderpest and its lessons for global health campaigns. Politics and the Life Sciences. 2013;32:43–57. doi: 10.2990/32_1_43. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larson HJ, Cooper LZ, Eskola J, Katz SL, Ratzan S. Addressing the vaccine confidence gap. The Lancet. 2011;378:526–535. PubMed. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources