Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;239(3):835-846.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-06025-0. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

Grasping performance depends upon the richness of hand feedback

Prajith Sivakumar  1   2 , Derek J Quinlan  2   3   4 , Kevin M Stubbs  2   3   5 , Jody C Culham  6   7
Affiliations

Grasping performance depends upon the richness of hand feedback

Prajith Sivakumar et al. Exp Brain Res. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Although visual feedback of the hand allows fast and accurate grasping actions, little is known about whether the nature of feedback of the hand affects performance. We investigated kinematics during precision grasping (with the index finger and thumb) when participants received different levels of hand feedback, with or without visual feedback of the target. Specifically, we compared performance when participants saw (1) no hand feedback; (2) only the two critical points on the index finger and thumb tips; (3) 21 points on all digit tips and hand joints; (4) 21 points connected by a "skeleton", or (5) full feedback of the hand wearing a glove. When less hand feedback was available, participants took longer to execute the movement because they allowed more time to slow the reach and close the hand. When target feedback was unavailable, participants took longer to plan the movement and reached with higher velocity. We were particularly interested in investigating maximum grip aperture (MGA), which can reflect the margin of error that participants allow to compensate for uncertainty. A trend suggested that MGA was smallest when ample feedback was available (skeleton and full hand feedback, regardless of target feedback) and when only essential information about hand and target was provided (2-point hand feedback + target feedback) but increased when non-essential points were included (21-point feedback). These results suggest that visual feedback of the hand affects grasping performance and that, while more feedback is usually beneficial, this is not necessarily always the case.

Keywords: Feedback; Grasping; Hand; Vision.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adamovich SV, August K, Merians A, Tunik E (2009) A virtual reality-based system integrated with fmri to study neural mechanisms of action observation-execution: a proof of concept study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 27:209–223. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-2009-0471 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ambron E, Schettino LF, Coyle M et al (2017) When perception trips action! The increase in the perceived size of both hand and target matters in reaching and grasping movements. Acta Psychol (Amst) 180:160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.09.011 - DOI
    1. Astafiev SV, Stanley CM, Shulman GL, Corbetta M (2004) Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions. Nat Neurosci 7:542–548. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1241 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berthier NE, Clifton RK, Gullapalli V et al (1996) Visual information and object size in the control of reaching. J Mot Behav 28:187–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1996.9941744 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonda E, Ostry D, Evans A (1996) Specific involvement of human parietal systems in the perception of biological motion and the amygdala. J Neurosci 16:3737–3744. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-11-03737.1996 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources