Prevalence and 6-month recovery of olfactory dysfunction: a multicentre study of 1363 COVID-19 patients
- PMID: 33403772
- DOI: 10.1111/joim.13209
Prevalence and 6-month recovery of olfactory dysfunction: a multicentre study of 1363 COVID-19 patients
Abstract
Objective: To investigate prevalence and recovery of olfactory dysfunction (OD) in COVID-19 patients according to the disease severity.
Methods: From 22 March to 3 June 2020, 2581 COVID-19 patients were identified from 18 European hospitals. Epidemiological and clinical data were extracted at baseline and within the 2-month post-infection.
Results: The prevalence of OD was significantly higher in mild form (85.9%) compared with moderate-to-critical forms (4.5-6.9%; P = 0.001). Of the 1916 patients with OD, 1363 completed the evaluations (71.1%). A total of 328 patients (24.1%) did not subjectively recover olfaction 60 days after the onset of the dysfunction. The mean duration of self-reported OD was 21.6 ± 17.9 days. Objective olfactory evaluations identified hyposmia/anosmia in 54.7% and 36.6% of mild and moderate-to-critical forms, respectively (P = 0.001). At 60 days and 6 months, 15.3% and 4.7% of anosmic/hyposmic patients did not objectively recover olfaction, respectively. The higher baseline severity of objective olfactory evaluations was strongly predictive of persistent OD (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: OD is more prevalent in mild COVID-19 forms than in moderate-to-critical forms. OD disappeared in 95% of patients regarding objective olfactory evaluations at 6 months.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; anosmia; olfactory; recovery; smell.
© 2021 The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine.
Comment in
-
Long-term recovery from COVID-19 anosmia: Promising findings and unanswered questions.J Intern Med. 2021 Aug;290(2):462-463. doi: 10.1111/joim.13247. Epub 2021 Feb 12. J Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 33462906 Free PMC article.
-
Pathophysiological mechanisms and management of patients with long-time anosmia related to COVID-19.J Intern Med. 2021 Aug;290(2):464-465. doi: 10.1111/joim.13257. Epub 2021 Feb 15. J Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 33527593 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Psychophysical evaluations are important, usefulness and usability approaches to study the smell disorder related to COVID-19.J Intern Med. 2021 Aug;290(2):468-469. doi: 10.1111/joim.13297. Epub 2021 Jun 10. J Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 33817882 Free PMC article.
-
Truths and fakes in the smell terminology during the COVID-19 outbreak.J Intern Med. 2021 Aug;290(2):466-467. doi: 10.1111/joim.13295. Epub 2021 Jun 10. J Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 34110054 No abstract available.
References
-
- WHO website. www.who.int/docs. Consulted September 22, 2020.
-
- Lechien JR, Chiesa-Estomba CM, Hans S, Barillari MR, Jouffe L, Saussez S. Loss of smell and taste in 2013 European patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Ann Int Med 2020; 173: 672-5. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-2428
-
- Zhang X, Tan Y, Ling Y et al. Viral and host factors related to the clinical outcome of COVID-19. Nature 2020; 583: 437-40. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2355-0
-
- Hopkins C, Surda P, Kumar N. Presentation of new onset anosmia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rhinology. 2020; 58: 295-8.
-
- Vaira LA, Hopkins C, Salzano G et al. Olfactory and gustatory function impairment in COVID-19 patients: Italian objective multicenter-study. Head Neck 2020; 42: 1560-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26269
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
