Types of Lifetime Reproductive Coercion and Current Contraceptive Use
- PMID: 33404346
- PMCID: PMC8403199
- DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8784
Types of Lifetime Reproductive Coercion and Current Contraceptive Use
Abstract
Background: Intimate partner violence and differential power dynamics are associated with contraceptive behaviors. This study examines the role of reproductive coercion (RC) by an intimate partner in women's decisions about contraceptive use. Materials and Methods: A self-report survey was administered to a probability sample of a diverse group of women of reproductive age in Delaware's Title X health care facilities. Currently used contraceptive methods were categorized into three effectiveness levels based on typical use failure rates: no method or low effectiveness (>10% failure), moderate effectiveness (>1% and <10% failure), and high effectiveness (<1% failure). The short-form RC scale was used to categorize RC experiences: no RC, verbal only, or behavioral. We conducted multinomial logistic regression to examine the association between types of RC and effectiveness level of current contraceptive method, taking our sampling design into account and adjusting for covariates. Results: Among 240 women (weighted n = 6529) included in the sample, 13.9% reported experiencing only verbal RC, and 16.1% reported behavioral RC. Women who reported behavioral RC were more likely to currently be using highly versus moderately (adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR]: 26.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.59-156.0) and low effective methods (aRRR: 3.08, 95% CI: 0.97-9.82), but less likely to be using moderately (aRRR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02-0.77) than low effective methods. Conclusions: Using highly and low effective methods may indicate two opposing ways of managing behavioral RC experiences: controlling fertility by choosing less detectable but highly effective methods or feeling disempowered and using no or low effective partner-dependent methods.
Keywords: contraception; contraceptive behaviors; contraceptive use; intimate partner violence; reproductive coercion.
Conflict of interest statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Comment in
-
Recognizing the Lasting Effects of Reproductive Coercion on Contraceptive Choices: Considering Trauma in a Pandemic Context.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Aug;30(8):1055-1056. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8963. Epub 2021 Jan 6. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021. PMID: 33404347 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kost K.Unintended pregnancy rates at the state level: Estimates for 2010 and trends since 2002. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2015. Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/stateup10.pdf Accessed December23, 2020
-
- Sonfield A, Hasstedt K, Kavanaugh ML, Anderson R. The Social and Economic Benefits of Women's Ability to Determine Whether and When To Have Children. Guttmacher Institute; 2013. Available at https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/social-economi... Accessed December23, 2020
-
- Huynh L, McCoy M, Law A, et al. . Systematic literature review of the costs of pregnancy in the US. Pharmacoeconomics 2013;31:1005–1030 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
