Treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation versus liver transplantation and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: a population-based study
- PMID: 33404697
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07551-9
Treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation versus liver transplantation and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: a population-based study
Abstract
Objectives: Restricted mean survival time (RMST) has been increasingly used to assess the treatment effect. We aimed to evaluate a treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus liver transplantation (LT) and surgical resection (SR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria by using an adjusted RMST.
Methods: A total of 7,218 HCC patients (RFA, 3,327; LT, 2,332; SR 1,523) within Milan criteria were eligible for this retrospectively study. The RMST using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment were applied to estimate the treatment effect between RFA and LT, RFA, and SR groups.
Results: The 3-, 5-, and 10-year IPTW-adjusted difference in RMST of OS for LT over RFA were + 4.5, + 12.4, and + 36.3 months, respectively. For SR versus RFA group, the survival benefit was + 2.3, + 6.1, and + 15.8 months at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. But the incremental survival benefit of SR over RFA was only half than that of LT over RFA. In the subgroup of solitary tumor ≤ 2 cm, the adjusted RMST of RFA versus SR was comparable with no statistical differences. Beyond that, in comparison with RFA, a notably greater efficacy of LT and SR was consistently across all subgroups with solitary HCC > 2.0 cm, AFP positive or negative, and fibrosis score 0-4 or 5-6.
Conclusions: RMST provides a measure of absolute survival benefit at a specific time point. Using IPTW-adjusted RMST, we showed that the incremental survival benefit of SR over RFA was about half than that of LT over RFA.
Key points: • The restricted mean survival time offers an intuitive, clinically meaningful interpretation to quantify the treatment effect than the hazard ratio. • Liver transplantation and surgical resection provided better overall survival compared to radiofrequency ablation for HCC patients within Milan criteria, but RFA and SR provide equivalent long-term overall survival for solitary HCC ≤ 2 cm. • The incremental survival benefit of surgical resection over radiofrequency ablation was only half than that of liver transplantation over radiofrequency ablation.
Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver transplantation; Radiofrequency ablation; Restricted mean survival time; Surgical resection.
References
-
- European Association for the Study of the Liver (2018) EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 69:182–236
-
- Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin C et al (2018) Diagnosis, staging and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 68:723–750 - DOI
-
- Pinna AD, Yang T, Mazzaferro V et al (2018) Liver transplantation and hepatic resection can achieve cure for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 268:868–875 - DOI
-
- Taura K, Ikai I, Hatano E et al (2007) Influence of coexisting cirrhosis on outcomes after partial hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma fulfilling the Milan criteria: an analysis of 293 patients. Surgery 142:685–694 - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
