Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;25(6):3977-3986.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03728-0. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

What diagnostic strategy performs better for caries lesion detection on proximal surfaces of adolescents?

Affiliations

What diagnostic strategy performs better for caries lesion detection on proximal surfaces of adolescents?

Caroline M Moriyama et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of visual inspection alone and associated to radiographic and laser fluorescence (LF) methods in detecting non-evident caries lesions at adolescents' proximal surfaces.

Materials and methods: Adolescents (12 to 17 years old) were assessed for the presence of caries lesions through visual inspection, radiographic examination, and LF method (DIAGNOdent pen), at non-cavitated (NC) and cavitated lesion (CAV) thresholds. Temporary separation with orthodontic rubbers followed by direct visual inspection was the reference standard method. Two examiners conducted the examinations, and the first examiner reassessed around 20% of the sample, to evaluate inter- and intra-examiner reproducibility, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and utility values were calculated for the methods alone and combined with visual inspection using two different strategies: simultaneous and sequential combination.

Results: A total of 834 proximal surfaces (51 adolescents) were included. Visual inspection presented higher reproducibility values (higher than 0.98). Moreover, visual inspection presented higher sensitivity (around 0.51) than those obtained with other diagnostic strategies (varying from 0.09 to 0.20) at the NC threshold. For CAV, visual inspection presented higher specificity (0.996) than the sequential association with adjunct methods (around 0.97), but with lower sensitivity. Accuracy and utility values for combined strategies were similar or lower than those achieved with the visual inspection performed alone.

Conclusion: Visual inspection alone performs better for detecting caries lesions in premolars and molars of adolescents than other diagnostic strategies.

Clinical relevance: The best diagnostic strategy for caries detection of proximal caries lesions in adolescents is the visual inspection alone.

Keywords: Accuracy studies; Adolescents; Caries detection; Proximal surfaces; Sensitivity; Specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Braga MM, Mendes FM, Ekstrand KR (2010) Detection activity assessment and diagnosis of dental caries lesions. Dent Clin N Am 54:479–493 - DOI
    1. Gimenez T, Piovesan C, Braga MM, Raggio DP, Deery C, Ricketts DN, Ekstrand KR, Mendes FM (2015) Clinical relevance of studies on the accuracy of visual inspection for detecting caries lesions: a systematic review. Caries Res 49:91–98 - DOI
    1. Gimenez T, Piovesan C, Braga MM, Raggio DP, Deery C, Ricketts DN, Ekstrand KR, Mendes FM (2015) Visual inspection for caries detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 94:895–904 - DOI
    1. Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ (2002) A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions. J Public Health Dent 62:201–213 - DOI
    1. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) (2016) Guideline on prescribing dental radiographs for infants, children, adolescents, and persons with special health care needs. Pediatr Dent 34:189–191

LinkOut - more resources