Regulating reproductive genetic services: dealing with spiral-shaped processes and techno-scientific imaginaries
- PMID: 33405005
- PMCID: PMC7884509
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-02017-9
Regulating reproductive genetic services: dealing with spiral-shaped processes and techno-scientific imaginaries
Abstract
Purpose: We have been inquiring into the diffusion process of reproductive genetic services (RGS) and the viability of geneticization in human reproduction.
Method: A 2-round modified-Delphi survey was applied amongst Israeli and Spanish experts to analyze regulatory attitudes and expectations about the future applications of RGS. We argue that an explanation of RGS diffusion based on a 'technology-push' impulse should be complemented by a 'demandpull' approach, which underscores the importance of regulatory frameworks and demand-inducing policies. The diffusion of RGS is advancing in a 'spiralshaped' process where technology acts as a cause and effect simultaneously, modulating social acceptance and redefining the notions of health and responsibility along the way.
Results: We suggest that there is a 'grey-zone' of RGS regulations regarding four procedures: the use of germline genome modification (GGM) for severe monogenic disorders, preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for detection of chromosomal abnormalities, PGT for multifactorial diseases, and PGT with whole-exome screening.
Conclusions: Although far from the geneticization of human reproduction, our findings suggest that, since techno-scientific imaginaries tend to shape regulations and thus favor the diffusion of RGS, policymakers should pay attention to those procedures by focusing on good practices and equity while providing sound information on potential risks and expected success rates. A broad and inclusive societal debate is critical for overcoming the difficulty of drawing a clear line between medical and non-medical uses of genetic selection and engineering while searching for the right balance between allowing reproductive autonomy and protecting the public interest.
Keywords: Assisted reproductive technologies; Delphi; Diffusion of innovation; Preimplantation genetic testing; Regulating emerging technologies; Reproductive genetic services.
Similar articles
-
An evolving landscape: reproductive genetics, new technologies and health care over the next decade.Contraception. 2008 Dec;78(6):433-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.05.093. Epub 2008 Oct 14. Contraception. 2008. PMID: 19014788 No abstract available.
-
Utilization of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders.Fertil Steril. 2020 Oct;114(4):854-860. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.05.045. Fertil Steril. 2020. PMID: 33040985
-
Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproductive technology: current state and future perspectives.J Genet Genomics. 2020 Dec 20;47(12):723-726. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2020.11.007. Epub 2021 Jan 26. J Genet Genomics. 2020. PMID: 33674238 Review.
-
Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Jan;36(1):64-83. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30685-X. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014. PMID: 24444289
-
Preimplantation genetic testing: current challenges and future prospects.Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2017 Dec;17(12):1071-1088. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2017.1394186. Epub 2017 Nov 8. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2017. PMID: 29039978 Review.
Cited by
-
Tackling real-world issues in human ARTs-the missing link between stakeholders.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Jul;41(7):1701-1702. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03199-2. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 39001952 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Mapping ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT).J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 May;41(5):1153-1171. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03076-y. Epub 2024 Mar 21. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 38512655 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: challenges in clinical practice.Hum Genomics. 2022 Dec 20;16(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40246-022-00442-8. Hum Genomics. 2022. PMID: 36536471 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mapping ethical, legal, & social implications (ELSI) of assisted reproductive technologies.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Sep;40(9):2045-2062. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02854-4. Epub 2023 Jun 29. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023. PMID: 37382787 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Alon I, Guimon J, Urbanos-Garrido R. What to expect from assisted reproductive technologies? Experts’ forecasts for the next two decades. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2019a;148. 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119722.
-
- Asch A, Barlevy D. Disability and genetics: a disability critique of pre-natal testing and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). eLS. Chichester: Wiley; 2012.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical