Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):20.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02442-5.

Designing health professional education curricula using systems thinking perspectives

Priya Khanna  1 , Chris Roberts  2 , Andrew Stuart Lane  1
Affiliations

Designing health professional education curricula using systems thinking perspectives

Priya Khanna et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Medical students navigate complex personal learning pathways from entry into medical school, through an educational program, and into life-long practice. However, many stakeholders have called for substantive reforms in contemporary curricula, citing concerns about the lack of key abilities amongst newly graduated doctors to work in complex healthcare environments. Despite the need for educators to focus on curricula design, there is a paucity of overarching perspectives that allow synthesis of the various curricular elements in a way that lends meaningfulness and appreciation to the students in terms of navigating the immediate program requirements and beyond. Without such guidance, educators risk creating fragmented program designs that can lead to both unintended and unactionable outcomes for students as well as curriculum designers. Using systems thinking, we set out to address this gap by providing an overarching perspective for curriculum designers to appreciate the relationships and the interactions of the various curricular elements that inform and impact student's preparedness for practice.

Methods: By framing a curriculum as a complex adaptive system, we used soft systems thinking to develop an initial prototype of a conceptual curricular toolkit, underpinned by an appraisal of relevant literature within health professional education and the broader educational context. The prototype was further refined iteratively after critical reflection by the authors with a diverse range of national and international colleagues via posters, short communications, and workshops at several conferences, and through social media.

Results: We describe how the 3P-6Cs toolkit captures a learner's personal journey through an educational program into a field of practice by logically linking the three key elements: the personal, the program, and the practice. We demonstrate its application in three examples related to contemporary health profession education curricula. These are: creating integrated educational designs to capture students' developmental continua, conceptualising immersive clinical placements in non-traditional settings, and complexity-consistent evaluation of curricular interventions.

Conclusion: Applying the 3P-6Cs curricular toolkit to problems of curricula (re)design can provide overarching perspectives that enable educators to have a better understanding of how integration of elements within education programs can inform and impact student's preparation for lifelong practice.

Keywords: Complexity; Curriculum; Education; Educational design; Systems thinking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Chris Roberts is a section editor of BMC Medical Education. Priya Khanna and Stuart Lane have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
3P-6Cs Systems Thinking Toolkit
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Application of 6Cs to create a coherent and integrated curricular design
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Applying 3P-6Cs in creating coherent mini-curriculum for immersive clinical placements
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Holmboe ES. Competency-based medical education and the ghost of Kuhn: reflections on the messy and meaningful work of transformation. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):350–353. - PubMed
    1. Monrouxe LV, Bullock A, Gormley G, Kaufhold K, Kelly N, Roberts CE, Mattick K, Rees C. New graduate doctors’ preparedness for practice: a multistakeholder, multicentre narrative study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e023146. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jorm C, Roberts C. Using complexity theory to guide medical school evaluations. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):399–405. - PubMed
    1. Lomis KD, Russell RG, Davidson MA, Fleming AE, Pettepher CC, Cutrer WB, Fleming GM, Miller BM. Competency milestones for medical students: design, implementation, and analysis at one medical school. Medical teacher. 2017;39(5):494–504. - PubMed
    1. Storrar N, Hope D, Cameron H. Student perspective on outcomes and process–recommendations for implementing competency-based medical education. Medical Teacher. 2019;41(2):161–166. - PubMed