Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 30:12:13469-13478.
doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S286292. eCollection 2020.

A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer

Affiliations

A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer

Shilin He et al. Cancer Manag Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).

Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.

Results: Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).

Conclusion: Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.

Keywords: incidental gallbladder carcinoma; prognosis; salvage surgery; simultaneous surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection process for incidental gallbladder cancer patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier survival curve for overall survival in incidental gallbladder cancer.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier survival curve for recurrence-free survival in incidental gallbladder cancer.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Time interval analysis for incidental gallbladder cancer patients undergoing previous cholecystectomy and delayed resection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Miranda-Filho A, Pineros M, Ferreccio C, et al. Gallbladder and extrahepatic bile duct cancers in the Americas: incidence and mortality patterns and trends. Int J Cancer. 2020;147:978–989. doi:10.1002/ijc.32863 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shindoh J, de Aretxabala X, Aloia TA, et al. Tumor location is a strong predictor of tumor progression and survival in T2 gallbladder cancer an international multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):733–739. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zeng H, Chen W, Zheng R, et al. Changing cancer survival in China during 2003–15: a pooled analysis of 17 population-based cancer registries. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(5):e555–e567. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30127-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goetze TO. Gallbladder carcinoma: prognostic factors and therapeutic options. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(43):12211–12217. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12211 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kasumova GG, Tabatabaie O, Najarian RM, et al. Surgical management of gallbladder cancer: simple versus extended cholecystectomy and the role of adjuvant therapy. Ann Surg. 2017;266(4):625–631. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002385 - DOI - PubMed