Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;406(5):1387-1395.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02051-2. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

Short-term outcome after robot-assisted hiatal hernia and anti-reflux surgery-is there a benefit for the patient?

Affiliations

Short-term outcome after robot-assisted hiatal hernia and anti-reflux surgery-is there a benefit for the patient?

Frank Benedix et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: The robotic system was introduced to overcome the technical limitations of conventional laparoscopy. For complex oncological operations, it appears to offer further advantages. With regard to hiatal hernia repair, its role has yet to be determined.

Methods: All consecutive patients who received elective laparoscopic or robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair at a single institution between January 2016 and July 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. We compared both techniques with particular focus on their short-term outcome. A propensity score-matched comparison considering clinical and surgical covariates was also performed between the two groups.

Results: 140 patients were included, and 55 (39.3%) underwent a robot-assisted procedure. The baseline demographics and the frequency of previous abdominal operations were comparable for both groups. The size of the hiatal hernia did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.06). The mean operative time was significantly longer for the robot-assisted procedure (149 vs. 125 min; p < 0.01) but decreased markedly during the study period. By contrast, no significant differences were observed in terms of conversion rate (p = 1.0) and blood loss (p = 0.25). Likewise, the postoperative morbidity was comparable for both groups (10.9 vs. 12.9; p = 0.79). The hospital length of stay was not significantly different between the laparoscopic and robotic group (4.0 vs. 3.6 days; p = 0.2). After propensity score-matching, 48 patients were identified for each group. Except for the operative time, no other significant differences were found. Thus, the results of the univariate analysis were confirmed.

Conclusion: Our initial results failed to demonstrate a clear advantage of the robotic technique in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or symptomatic hiatal hernias.

Keywords: Gastroesophageal reflux; Hiatal hernia; Laparoscopy; Perioperative outcome; Robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Boeckxstaens G, El-Serag HB, Smout AJPM, Kahrilas PJ (2014) Symptomatic reflux disease: the present, the past and the future. Gut 63:1185–1193 - DOI
    1. El-Serag HB, Becher A, Jones R (2010) Systematic review: persistent reflux symptoms on proton pump inhibitor therapy in primary care and community studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 32:720–737 - DOI
    1. Labenz J, Labenz G, Stephan D, Willeke F, LOPA-Studiengruppe (2016) Insufficient symptom control under long-term treatment with PPI in GERD - fact or fiction? MMW Fortschr Med 158(Suppl 4):7–11 - DOI
    1. Pauwels A, Boeckxstaens V, Andrews CN, Attwood SE, Berrisford R, Bisschops R et al (2019) How to select patients for antireflux surgery? The ICARUS guidelines (international consensus regarding preoperative examinations and clinical characteristics assessment to select adult patients for antireflux surgery). Gut 68:1928–1941 - DOI
    1. Pizza F, Rossetti G, Limongelli P, Del Genio G, Maffettone V, Napolitano et al (2007) Influence of age on outcome of total laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol 13:740–747 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources