Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 31;61(6):538-546.
doi: 10.3325/cmj.2020.61.538.

The analysis of waiting time and utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Croatia: a nationwide survey

Zrinka Biloglav, Petar Medaković  1 , Jure Buljević, Franko Žuvela, Ivan Padjen, Dina Vrkić, Josip Ćurić
Affiliations

The analysis of waiting time and utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Croatia: a nationwide survey

Zrinka Biloglav et al. Croat Med J. .

Abstract

Aim: To assess the variation in the waiting time for diagnostic imaging (DI) services among Croatian public hospitals and the utilization of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners.

Methods: We analyzed aggregated data from public hospitals. Counties were classified according to economic strength, and utilization was expressed as the average number of exams per machine. We compared the waiting times for 2018 and utilization for 2015 according to hospital category (high and low level) and economic strength by county.

Results: The waiting time was longer for MRI compared with CT, 268 vs 77.61 days. Overall CT waiting time was in the unfavorable European Health Consumer Index category. High-level hospitals had longer waiting time for MRI and CT. The waiting time positively correlated with economic strength for MRI (P=0.019), but not for CT. In low-level hospitals, MRI utilization ranged from 104 to 6032, whereas CT utilization ranged from 48 to 17852. In high-level hospitals, MRI utilization ranged from 3846 to 11 026, while CT utilization ranged from 503 to 17 234. CT (P=0.041) and MRI (P=0.031) utilization in high-level hospitals was significantly higher than in low-level hospitals.

Conclusion: The waiting times for CT and MRI were exceptionally long regardless of the hospital category, with highly varying utilization. Croatia performed more exams per scanner compared with other EU countries, but not significantly so. High-level hospitals' utilization was significantly higher than that of low-level hospitals, and CT utilization was significantly higher than EU average, while the difference for MRI utilization was not significant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Waiting times for computed tomography (European Health Consumer Index 2018). x-axis: country; y-axis: European Health Consumer Index (categorization of waiting time): 3 = bad (waiting time >21 days), up to 2 = intermediate (waiting time 7-21 days), up to 1 = good (waiting time <7 days).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cullis JG, Jones PR, Propper C. Chapter 23 Waiting lists and medical treatment: Analysis and policies. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP. Handbook of Health Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.; 2000. p. 1201-49.
    1. Siciliani L, Hurst J. Tackling excessive waiting times for elective surgery: a comparative analysis of policies in 12 OECD countries. Health Policy. 2005;72:201–15. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.07.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siciliani L, Verzulli R. Waiting times and socioeconomic status among elderly Europeans: evidence from SHARE. Health Econ. 2009;18:1295–306. doi: 10.1002/hec.1429. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Šućur Z, Zrinščak S. Differences that hurt: self-perceived health inequalities in Croatia and the European Union. Croat Med J. 2007;48:653–66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Census of Population. Households and Dwellings 2011. Zagreb: Croatian Bureau of Statistics; 2012.