Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;92(3):1021-1033.
doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09868-6. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

Psychiatric Clinical Profiles and Pharmacological Interactions in COVID-19 Inpatients Referred to a Consultation Liaison Psychiatry Unit: a Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Psychiatric Clinical Profiles and Pharmacological Interactions in COVID-19 Inpatients Referred to a Consultation Liaison Psychiatry Unit: a Cross-Sectional Study

Nestor Arbelo et al. Psychiatr Q. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) can affect mental health in different ways. There is little research about psychiatric complications in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The aim of the study was to describe the psychiatric clinical profile and pharmacological interactions in COVID-19 inpatients referred to a Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry (CLP) unit. This is a cross-sectional study, carried out at a tertiary hospital in Spain, in inpatients admitted because of COVID-19 and referred to our CLP Unit from March 17,2020 to April 28,2020. Clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records. The patients were divided in three groups depending on psychiatric diagnosis: delirium, severe mental illness (SMI) and non-severe mental illness (NSMI). Of 71 patients included (median [ICR] age 64 [54-73] years; 70.4% male), 35.2% had a delirium, 18.3% had a SMI, and 46.5% had a NSMI. Compared to patients with delirium and NSMI, patients with SMI were younger, more likely to be institutionalized and were administered less anti-COVID19 drugs. Mortality was higher among patients with delirium (21.7%) than those with SMI (0%) or NSMI (9.45%). The rate of side effects due to interactions between anti-COVID19 and psychiatric drugs was low, mainly drowsiness (4.3%) and borderline QTc prolongation (1.5%). Patients affected by SMI were more often undertreated for COVID-19. However, the rate of interactions was very low, and avoidable with a proper evaluation and drug-dose adjustment. Half of the patients with SMI were institutionalized, suggesting that living conditions in residential facilities could make them more vulnerable to infection.

Keywords: COVID-19; Consultation-liaison psychiatry; Delirium; Mental health residential facilities; Pharmacological interactions; Psychopharmacology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Arbelo has received CME-related financing and travel grants from Janssen-Cilag and Lundbeck and reports no financial or other relationship relevant to the subject of this article. Dr. López-Pelayo has received travel grants from the laboratories honoraria and travel grants from Janssen and Lundbeck. None of them has relationship with this research. Dr. Sagué has received travel grants and CME-related honoraria from Janssen-Cilag and Lundbeck and reports no financial or other relationship relevant to the subject of this article. Dr. Madero has received travel grants and CME-related honoraria from Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Pfizer and Angelini and reports no financial or other relationship relevant to the subject of this article. Dr. Pinzón has received CME-related honoraria from Lundbeck, all unrelated to the present work. Dr. Gomes-da-Costa has received CME-related honoraria, or consulting fees from Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Italfarmaco and Angelini and reports no financial or other relationship relevant to the subject of this article. Dr. Ilzarbe has received CME-related financing and travel grants from Janssen-Cilag and reports no financial or other relationship relevant to the subject of this article. Dr. Anmella has received CME-related honoraria, or consulting fees from Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck and Angelini and reports no financial or other relationship relevant to the subject of this article. Dr. Llach has received CME-related financing and travel grants from Janssen-Cilag and reports no financial or other relationship relevant to the subject of this article. All other authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang S, Wen X, Dong Y, Liu B, Cui M. Psychological influence of coronovirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the general public, medical workers, and patients with mental disorders and its countermeasures. Psychosomatics. Elsevier Inc.; 2020. 10.1016/j.psym.2020.05.005 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang C, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051729. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e203976–6. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anmella G, et al. Unravelling potential severe psychiatric repercussions on healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 crisis. J Affect Disord. Elsevier B.V.;2020;273:422–424. 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.061. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rogers JP, Chesney E, Oliver D, Pollak TA, McGuire P, Fusar-Poli P, Zandi MS, Lewis G, David AS. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(7):611–627. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30203-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types