Does Radical Hysterectomy for Clinically Apparent Stage II Endometrial Cancer Affect Risk of Local Recurrence?

Abstract

Objective: Compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and morbidity between radical hysterectomy (RH) and simple hysterectomy (SH) for clinically diagnosed stage II endometrial cancer.

Methods: A multicentre, retrospective study, from 2000 to 2015, involving patients with endometrial cancer with cervical involvement preoperatively and stromal invasion on final pathology. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier survival functions, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for analysis.

Results: Ninety of 1613 patients had clinical stage II endometrial cancer; 57 underwent RH and 33 underwent SH, with no difference in adjuvant treatment or morbidity. About half of patients (51%) had pathologic stage III-IV disease. Mean follow-up was 3.3 and 3.8 years for SH and RH, respectively. Thirty-three percent of patients with RH and SH experienced a recurrence. Most recurrences were distant: 90% with SH and 79% with RH. There was no difference in RFS between groups (2-year: SH 65% vs. RH 75%; 5-year: SH 54% vs. RH 63%; P = 0.72). Controlling for stage, adjuvant treatment, and margin status, RH was not associated with RFS (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.28-1.35). Among 44 patients with pathologic stage II disease, 7 had a recurrence (4 SH and 3 RH); 6 of 7 had distant recurrences.

Conclusions: Fifty-one percent of patients with clinical stage II endometrial cancer had advanced disease on final pathology, highlighting the importance of surgical staging. RH was not associated with RFS or reduced morbidity. Most recurrences were distant. Although RH could be performed to achieve negative surgical margins, SH may be sufficient for central, small tumours given the high risk of advanced disease and distant recurrence. Research efforts should further elucidate the ideal management of these patients.

Keywords: endometrial neoplasms; hysterectomy; recurrence.