Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):29.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03514-6.

Factors contributing to men's grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal death: further development of an emerging model in an Australian sample

Affiliations

Factors contributing to men's grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal death: further development of an emerging model in an Australian sample

Kate Louise Obst et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Historically, men's experiences of grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal death have been under-explored in comparison to women. However, investigating men's perspectives is important, given potential gendered differences concerning grief styles, help-seeking and service access. Few studies have comprehensively examined the various individual, interpersonal, community and system/policy-level factors which may contribute to the intensity of grief in bereaved parents, particularly for men.

Methods: Men (N = 228) aged at least 18 years whose partner had experienced an ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, stillbirth, termination of pregnancy for foetal anomaly, or neonatal death within the last 20 years responded to an online survey exploring their experiences of grief. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to examine the factors associated with men's grief intensity and style.

Results: Men experienced significant grief across all loss types, with the average score sitting above the minimum cut-off considered to be a high degree of grief. Men's total grief scores were associated with loss history, marital satisfaction, availability of social support, acknowledgement of their grief from family/friends, time spent bonding with the baby during pregnancy, and feeling as though their role of 'supporter' conflicted with their ability to process grief. Factors contributing to grief also differed depending on grief style. Intuitive (emotion-focused) grief was associated with support received from healthcare professionals. Instrumental (activity-focused) grief was associated with time and quality of attachment to the baby during pregnancy, availability of social support, acknowledgement of men's grief from their female partner, supporter role interfering with their grief, and tendencies toward self-reliance.

Conclusions: Following pregnancy loss and neonatal death, men can experience high levels of grief, requiring acknowledgement and validation from all healthcare professionals, family/friends, community networks and workplaces. Addressing male-specific needs, such as balancing a desire to both support and be supported, requires tailored information and support. Strategies to support men should consider grief styles and draw upon father-inclusive practice recommendations. Further research is required to explore the underlying causal mechanisms of associations found.

Keywords: Foetal anomaly; Grief; Men; Miscarriage; Neonatal death; Pregnancy loss; Stillbirth; Termination of pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Socioecological model of men’s grief. Socioecological model of men’s grief, demonstrating the factors contributing to men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal death at the individual, interpersonal, community and public policy levels. This image was generated by the authors for a previous publication [36]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burden C, Bradley S, Storey C, Ellis A, Heazel AEP, Downe S, et al. From grief, guilt pain and stigma to hope and pride – a systematic review and meta-analysis of mixed-method research of the psychosocial impact of stillbirth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:9. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0800-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murphy S, Cacciatore J. The psychological, social, and economic impact of stillbirth on families. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;22(3):129–134. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.02.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van den Akker OBA. The psychological and social consequences of miscarriage. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011;6(3):295–304. doi: 10.1586/eog.11.14. - DOI
    1. Mills TA, Ricklesford C, Cooke A, Heazell AEP, Whitworth M, Lavender T. Parents' experiences and expectations of care in pregnancy after stillbirth or neonatal death: a metasynthesis. BJOG. 2014;121(8):943–950. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12656. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mulvihill A, Walsh T. Pregnancy loss in rural Ireland: an experience of disenfranchised grief. Br J Soc Work. 2014;44(8):2290–2306. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct078. - DOI

MeSH terms