Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):8.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01072-1.

How effective are social norms interventions in changing the clinical behaviours of healthcare workers? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mei Yee Tang  1   2 , Sarah Rhodes  3 , Rachael Powell  4 , Laura McGowan  4 , Elizabeth Howarth  3 , Benjamin Brown  5   6 , Sarah Cotterill  3
Affiliations

How effective are social norms interventions in changing the clinical behaviours of healthcare workers? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mei Yee Tang et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers perform clinical behaviours which impact on patient diagnoses, care, treatment and recovery. Some methods of supporting healthcare workers in changing their behaviour make use of social norms by exposing healthcare workers to the beliefs, values, attitudes or behaviours of a reference group or person. This review aimed to evaluate evidence on (i) the effect of social norms interventions on healthcare worker clinical behaviour change and (ii) the contexts, modes of delivery and behaviour change techniques (BCTs) associated with effectiveness.

Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Searches were undertaken in seven databases. The primary outcome was compliance with a desired healthcare worker clinical behaviour and the secondary outcome was patient health outcomes. Outcomes were converted into standardised mean differences (SMDs). We performed meta-analyses and presented forest plots, stratified by five social norms BCTs (social comparison, credible source, social reward, social incentive and information about others' approval). Sources of variation in social norms BCTs, context and mode of delivery were explored using forest plots, meta-regression and network meta-analysis.

Results: Combined data from 116 trials suggested that social norms interventions were associated with an improvement in healthcare worker clinical behaviour outcomes of 0.08 SMDs (95%CI 0.07 to 0.10) (n = 100 comparisons), and an improvement in patient health outcomes of 0.17 SMDs (95%CI 0.14 to 0.20) (n = 14), on average. Heterogeneity was high, with an overall I2 of 85.4% (healthcare worker clinical behaviour) and 91.5% (patient health outcomes). Credible source was more effective on average, compared to control conditions (SMD 0.30, 95%CI 0.13 to 0.47, n = 7). Social comparison also appeared effective, both on its own (SMD 0.05, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.08, n = 33) and with other BCTs, and seemed particularly effective when combined with prompts/cues (0.33, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.44, n = 5).

Conclusions: Social norms interventions appeared to be an effective method of changing the clinical behaviour of healthcare workers and have a positive effect on patient health outcomes in a variety of health service contexts. Although the overall result is modest and variable, there is the potential for social norms interventions to be applied at large scale.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42016045718 .

Keywords: Audit and feedback; Credible source; Health professional behaviour; Information about others’ approval; Meta-analysis; Social comparison; Social incentive; Social norm; Social reward; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Fixed effects forest plot summarised by alternative categorisation of BCTs
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item (%)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Funnel plot
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, Green C, Scott AK, Walley TJ, et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):15–19. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7456.15. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Howard RL, Avery AJ, Slavenburg S, Royal S, Pipe G, Lucassen P, et al. Which drugs cause preventable admissions to hospital? A systematic review. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2007;63(2):136–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02698.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Courtenay M, Rowbotham S, Lim R, Peters S, Yates K, Chater A. Examining influences on antibiotic prescribing by nurse and pharmacist prescribers: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e029177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029177. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paluck ELB, L. Social norms marketing aimed at gender based violence: a literature review. New York: International Rescue Committee; 2010.
    1. Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms. Psychological Science. 2007;18(5):429–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources