Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 7;18(1):7.
doi: 10.1186/s12986-020-00527-y.

Milk consumption and multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in humans

Affiliations
Review

Milk consumption and multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in humans

Xingxia Zhang et al. Nutr Metab (Lond). .

Abstract

In order to recapitulate the best available evidence of milk consumption and multiple health-related outcomes, we performed an umbrella review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews in humans. Totally, 41 meta-analyses with 45 unique health outcomes were included. Milk consumption was more often related to benefits than harm to a sequence of health-related outcomes. Dose-response analyses indicated that an increment of 200 ml (approximately 1 cup) milk intake per day was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, hypertension, colorectal cancer, metabolic syndrome, obesity and osteoporosis. Beneficial associations were also found for type 2 diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer's disease. Conversely, milk intake might be associated with higher risk of prostate cancer, Parkinson's disease, acne and Fe-deficiency anaemia in infancy. Potential allergy or lactose intolerance need for caution. Milk consumption does more good than harm for human health in this umbrella review. Our results support milk consumption as part of a healthy diet. More well-designed randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Keywords: Health; Meta-analysis; Milk; Systematic review; Umbrella review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the selection process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Map of outcomes associated with milk consumption

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Evershed RP, Payne S, Sherratt AG, Copley MS, Coolidge J, Urem-Kotsu D, et al. Earliest date for milk use in the near east and southeastern Europe linked to cattle herding. Nature. 2008;455:528–531. - PubMed
    1. Dudd SN, Evershed RP. Direct demonstration of milk as an element of archaeological economies. Science. 1998;282:1478–1481. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Global and regional food consumption patterns and trends. 2018. http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/3_foodconsumption/en/index4.html.
    1. Michaëlsson K, Wolk A, Langenskiöld S, Basu S, Warensjö E, Melhus H, et al. Milk intake and risk of mortality and fractures in women and men: cohort studies. BMJ. 2014;349:g6015. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bouglé D, Bouhallab S. Dietary bioactive peptides: human studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57:335–343. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources