Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 28:149:e1.
doi: 10.1017/S0950268820003076.

Correlation of population mortality of COVID-19 and testing coverage: a comparison among 36 OECD countries

C Wei  1 , C C Lee  2   3   4 , T C Hsu  2   4 , W T Hsu  4   5 , C C Chan  6 , S C Chen  2 , C J Chen  7
Affiliations

Correlation of population mortality of COVID-19 and testing coverage: a comparison among 36 OECD countries

C Wei et al. Epidemiol Infect. .

Abstract

Although testing is widely regarded as critical to fighting the COVID-19 pandemic, what measure and level of testing best reflects successful infection control remains unresolved. Our aim was to compare the sensitivity of two testing metrics - population testing number and testing coverage - to population mortality outcomes and identify a benchmark for testing adequacy. We aggregated publicly available data through 12 April on testing and outcomes related to COVID-19 across 36 OECD (Organization for Economic Development) countries and Taiwan. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated between the aforementioned metrics and following outcome measures: deaths per 1 million people, case fatality rate and case proportion of critical illness. Fractional polynomials were used to generate scatter plots to model the relationship between the testing metrics and outcomes. We found that testing coverage, but not population testing number, was highly correlated with population mortality (rs = -0.79, P = 5.975 × 10-9vs. rs = -0.3, P = 0.05) and case fatality rate (rs = -0.67, P = 9.067 × 10-6vs. rs = -0.21, P = 0.20). A testing coverage threshold of 15-45 signified adequate testing: below 15, testing coverage was associated with exponentially increasing population mortality; above 45, increased testing did not yield significant incremental mortality benefit. Taken together, testing coverage was better than population testing number in explaining country performance and can serve as an early and sensitive indicator of testing adequacy and disease burden.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; testing coverage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors disclose no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Scatter plots between coverage of tests and outcomes among the 36 OECD countries and Taiwan. The relationship between mortality (per 1 million people) of COVID-19 of 36 OECD countries and Taiwan and coverage of tests (a). The relationship between proportion of case fatalities and coverage of tests (b).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Scatter plots between population testing number and population mortality and case fatality among the 36 OECD countries and Taiwan. The relationship between mortality (per 1 million people) of COVID-19 of 36 OECD countries and Taiwan and number of tests per 1 million people (a). The relationship between COVID-19 case fatality and number of tests per 1 million people (b).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. COVID-19 Map. Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. Available at https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (Accessed 14 May 2020).
    1. Zhou F et al. (2020) Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet. 395(10229), 1054–1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gudbjartsson DF et al. (2020) Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the Icelandic population. New England Journal of Medicine 382(24), 2302–2315. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2006100. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walensky RP and del Rio C (2020) From mitigation to containment of the COVID-19 pandemic: putting the SARS-CoV-2 genie back in the bottle. Journal of the American Medical Association 323(19), 1889–1890. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6572. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Correcting under-reported COVID-19 case numbers: estimating the true scale of the pandemic|medRxiv. Available at https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.14.20036178v2 (Accessed 24 April 2020).

MeSH terms